These helpers were originally linking to libudev; this changes them to
link to libudev-private.
---
Makefile.am | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 3318829..df2022e 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -2053,7 +2053,7 @@
Thanks to Dave Reisner, I withdraw my request. I found another way to
take care of this that doesn't require a patch. :-)
William
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 04:11:49PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> These helpers were originally linking to libudev; this changes them to
> link to libu
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 11:35:00PM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Some dependencies (intltool, m4, dbus, pkg-config, PAM) are only
> required or useful for systemd, not for udev. Leave these required by
> default, but allow them to be made optional if the right flag is used to
> ./configure.
How a
All,
this series of patches will break up Makefile.am into 3 modules which
are included by the main Makefile.
This is designed to make it possible to enable or disable the udev or
systemd portions of the build using configure switches.
Currently everything is still built, because there are no co
---
Makefile-shared.am | 98 +++
Makefile.am| 99 +---
2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Makefile-shared.am
diff --git a/Makefile-shared.am b/Makefile-s
---
Makefile-udev.am | 671 +
Makefile.am | 675 +-
2 files changed, 674 insertions(+), 672 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Makefile-udev.am
diff --git a/Makefile-udev.am b/Makefile-ude
All,
on source-based distros like gentoo or lfs, and on distros that do not
use systemd as their init system, we need a way to build systemd and
udev separately from each other so that udev can be built without all of
systemd's build time dependencies.
This series of patches splits up Makefile.am
---
Makefile-shared.am | 117
Makefile.am| 99 +---
2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Makefile-shared.am
diff --git a/Makefile-shared.am b/Makefile-shared.
---
Makefile-udev.am | 690 ++
Makefile.am | 673 +
2 files changed, 692 insertions(+), 671 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Makefile-udev.am
diff --git a/Makefile-udev.am b/Makefile-ude
---
Makefile.am |9 -
configure.ac |8
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index e3e1cf1..55ee80a 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -238,7 +238,10 @@ SED_PROCESS = \
include Makefile-shared.am
include M
---
Makefile.am |3 +++
configure.ac |8
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 55ee80a..7cd68d6 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -237,7 +237,10 @@ SED_PROCESS = \
< $< > $@ || rm $@
include
Hi Lucas,
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:48:50AM -0300, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > on source-based distros like gentoo or lfs, and on distros that do not
>
> Don't you have
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:54:36AM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> 3. Don't provide split udev/systemd packages and stay on udev-182 (or
> whatever the version was before the split).
>
> Now, I've been involved with a source-based distro myself for almost 12
> years, and, at one point you just have
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:05:01PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:40 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > That is exactly my point. There are people in these distros who see
> > systemd as a kitchen sink they don't want. However, udev is more like
> >
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:38:08PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Wulf C. Krueger
> wrote:
> > Hello Auke,
> >
> > On 14.06.2012 23:05, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> >> or pick mdev
> >
> > Let me quote someone about mdev:
> >
> >
> > Haha, mdev, yeah right.
> >
Hello Auke,
I will answer your concerns as best as I can below.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 03:35:09PM -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> 1) Timing. systemd+udevd just got merged. We had a huge build system
> change. Let's not change it drastically again entirely now.
From the point of view of a sourc
Hello Auke,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:26:36AM +, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 2:32 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Hello Auke,
> >
> > I will answer your concerns as best as I can below.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 03:35:09PM -0700, Kok,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 07:27:26PM +0800, microcai wrote:
> 2012/6/15 William Hubbs
> > systemd has several more dependencies than udev. Because of that and
> > because of the way the build system is setup to only do a full systemd
> > build, I have to install all of syst
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:52:37PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> on source-based distros like gentoo or lfs, and on distros that do not
> use systemd as their init system, we need a way to build systemd and
> udev separately from each other so that udev can be built
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:40:39PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> Currently, the workflow would be like this:
>
> 1) build other components
> 2a) build prerequisites necessary for systemd, which are otherwhise
> unneeded; this needs to be installed into the local sysroot in
> order to le
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 06:22:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya,
>
> regarding the whole discussion on minimal builds and people wanting to
> pick specific parts of the systemd build leaving out others, beyond what
> the configure switches offer: Here are some guidelines how we recommen
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:50:14PM +0200, Malte Starostik wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012, 11:48:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > On Wed, 20.06.12 15:56, William Hubbs (w.d.hu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > It isn't for us, because, for example, if I use option 1,
Hey Lennart,
can yu give me a list of tools in the systemd tarball that non-systemd
systems can use besides systemd-tmpfiles and udev?
Thanks,
William
pgpqL8nNvCxsv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.fr
Thanks for getting me started on this. The attachedd list is what will
go in a systemd-tools package that I'm working on for gentoo. This will
not be installed if someone is using systemd.
Dave and Lennart, can you please look this over and let me know if I
should add back anything or drop anythin
Hey Lennart, Kay and all,
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:58:39PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Well, we intent to continue to make it possible to run udevd outside of
> systemd. But that's about it. We will not polish that, or add new
> features to that or anything.
>
> OTOH we do polish behavio
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:52:10PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 14.08.12 13:01, William Hubbs (w.d.hu...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > > (Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case
> > > you haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward
26 matches
Mail list logo
