all of mount_one will
*NOT* be detected(since r == 1). Is this the expected behavior?
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
message):
1. It will return ENXIO or ESRCH, right?
2. dispatch_wqueue(), bus_write_message() and
bus_kernel_write_message() returns 0
3. Next time dispatch_wqueue() called, it will retry, but never
succeed - so, deadlocked?
--
Regards,
- cee1
--
Regards,
- cee1
0001-basic-util.c-fopen_temporary-close-fd-if-failed.patch
Description: Binary data
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
2015-06-15 0:43 GMT+08:00 Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:49:55PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El jun. 14, 2015 10:21, cee1 fykc...@gmail.com escribió:
Hi all,
Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random each
time?
Because
of the services use the same binary systemd-random-seed with
different argv[1](load vs save)
Seems better than the patch v1, what do you think?
2015-06-19 21:34 GMT+08:00 cee1 fykc...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
As discussed at
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-June/033075.html
to libabc??
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
2015-06-19 15:34 GMT+08:00 Chaiken, Alison ali...@she-devel.com:
cee1 fykc...@gmail.com writes:
3.1 consider disabling readahead collection in the shipped devices,
but leave readahead replay enabled.
ceel, are you aware that readahead is deprecated in systemd and has not been
included since
, it will not save a new seed. May not be the
proper behavior?
2. The STATUS sent by the second and third sd_notify() are not shown
in systemctl status systemd-random-seed.service, need some kind of
improvement.
Please comment and give suggestions :)
--
Regards,
- cee1
0001-random-seed-Save-seed
2015-06-17 16:40 GMT+08:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 17.06.2015 um 05:06 schrieb cee1:
2015-06-16 0:21 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Mon, 15.06.15 23:33, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I maybe got confused.
First, systemd-random
2015-06-17 22:03 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 17.06.15 20:21, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
What I means is:
1. Load a saved seed to /dev/urandom.
2. The service read /dev/random, which will block until kernel thinks
there's enough entropy - then the Random
should be notify, right?
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
2015-06-17 23:38 GMT+08:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
Am 17.06.2015 um 17:08 schrieb cee1:
2015-06-17 22:03 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Wed, 17.06.15 20:21, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
What I means is:
1. Load a saved seed to /dev/urandom.
2
2015-06-16 0:21 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Mon, 15.06.15 23:33, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I maybe got confused.
First, systemd-random-seed.service will save a seed from
/dev/urandom when shutdown, and load that seed to /dev/urandom when
next boot up
mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo
requesting blocks.
BTW, systemd-bootchart has a option to chart entropy, how is the
entropy involved in boot up procedure?
---
1.
http://linux-kernel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/0FC8rduf/ioprio-set-idle-class-doesn-t-work-as-its-name-suggests
Regards,
- cee1
Hi all,
Why we need to read/save random seed? Can it be read from /dev/random each time?
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
2015-06-09 18:10 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Thu, 04.06.15 23:41, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
So why the Debug File System is mounted multi-times here? Any idea?
Hmm, my suspicion is that the file system might actually already be
mounted by the kernel
=exited status=32
Jan 01 08:00:02 localhost systemd[1]: Failed to mount Debug File System.
foo.service is a service with DefaultDependencies=no and Conflicts and
Before shutdown.target
So why the Debug File System is mounted multi-times here? Any idea?
--
Regards,
- cee1
:
* Which one takes priority?
* For 1, it will not do the mount action, but 2 will. Am I right? If
so, why we mount root here(again)?
And systemd-remount-fs.service will remount the root again, thus apply
options in fstab?
BTW, where are the units generated by generators?
--
Regards,
- cee1
ownership create
symlinks and so on.
That means ** all ** dev nodes are there when devtmpfs is mounted?
I thought devtmpfs makes a limited number of nodes for early boot-up.
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel
.
unix 2 [ ACC ] SEQPACKET LISTENING 326 1/systemd
/run/udev/control
Curious why?
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd
other device initialization stuffs.
2) Notifying systemd, let systemd start related daemons.
Is it right?
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
2015-05-20 1:01 GMT+08:00 Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com:
Hey cee1,
cee1 [2015-05-18 23:52 +0800]:
At the first glance, I find ureadahead has some difference compared
with the readahead once in systemd, IIRC:
Yes, for sure. systemd's was improved quite a bit. ureadahead is
mostly
2015-05-22 3:36 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Should be fixed in git. Please verify!
Confirmed, thanks!
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
-devel/2011-June/002654.html
* patch for systemd:
https://github.com/cee1/systemd/commit/c04c709880f0619434ff58580609300d892f281b
* patch for plymouth:
https://github.com/cee1/plymouth/commit/5be1bb7751b547fe5c125a42c3f2fe607568fa0f
--
1. http://dev.lemote.com/category/loonux3
Regards,
- cee1
,
and *** make the best schedule decision ***, e.g. If A is a much more
dependent unit, do not start A with too many units in parallel
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org
is in turn invoked in
job_finish_and_invalidate() -- All these happens before the
manager_loop running.
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
...@ubuntu.com:
Hello cee1,
cee1 [2015-05-18 18:24 +0800]:
Does the readahead-*.service shipped with systemd work for you?
systemd dropped the builtin readahead in 217. It's reasonably easy to
get back by reverting the drop readahead patches, but carrying that
patch in packages is fairly intrusive
2015-05-17 17:45 GMT+08:00 Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com:
Hello cee,
cee1 [2015-05-16 0:46 +0800]:
Thanks for the suggestion, it was other processes running in parallel
which presumably consuming lots of IO, after sending SIGSTOP at the
first (and SIGCONT later), the unit loading time
,
-Original Message-
From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-
boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of cee1
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:52 AM
To: systemd Mailing List
Subject: [systemd-devel] Reduce unit-loading time
Hi all,
We're trying systemd to boot up an ARM board
, or a compiled
version(containing resolved dependencies, or even the boot up
sequence)
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Hi all,
I notice in sd_bus_track_new, a callback can be specified, but when it
will be invoked?
It seems it will not be triggered when a name in track is removed.
--
Regards,
- cee1
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
2013/9/26 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:10:47PM +0800, cee1 wrote:
Let read()/write() report any error/EOF.
This look OK, but can you provide a bit of motivation?
It's a re-sent patch, the original thread is at
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives
Let read()/write() report any error/EOF.
---
src/shared/util.c | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c
index 2009553..3c08650 100644
--- a/src/shared/util.c
+++ b/src/shared/util.c
@@ -2186,8 +2186,10 @@ ssize_t
2013/9/12 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Thu, 12.09.13 09:43, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote:
What about the following patch? It simply do read/write again if poll
returns, and let read/write report error if something is wrong.
I guess that patch makes sense, but could you
;
}
+/*
if (pollfd.revents != POLLOUT)
return n 0 ? n : -EIO;
+ */
continue;
}
--
Regards,
- cee1
在 2013年2月13日星期三，Lennart Poettering 写道：
On Tue, 12.02.13 13:43, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com javascript:;) wrote:
Hi all,
systemd will call crash() if received fatal signals. It will produce a
core dump for analysis.
However, it seems signal handler has a separated stack, so can't back
be better if Systemd could timely report which units are
still starting.
E.g. we limit the max starting units meanwhile(which may improve boot
performance). When blocked, tell plymouth which units are started and
which units are still starting of the current batch.
Any ideas?
--
Regards,
- cee1
, more:
https://github.com/cee1/systemd/commit/89d049507734746f6f1100218ca97cc829b05e0a
* Has anyone tried the crash shell? I added a custom sysrq which will
send SEGV to init, hence triggered the crash(). According to the log,
crash shell was called and exited immediately.
--
Regards,
- cee1
/plymouth-quit.service
Then, how does it notify plymouth boot splash to quit?
Also I noticed prefdm.service has relations with plymouth-quit.service:
Conflicts=plymouth-quit.service
After=plymouth-quit.service
What does that mean?
--
Regards,
- cee1
40 matches
Mail list logo
