Re: [systemd-devel] How can I simply check that a service has been restarted ?

2020-11-18 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 6:35 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 17:22 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 18:12 +0100, Francis Moreau wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:43 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at

Re: [systemd-devel] How can I simply check that a service has been restarted ?

2020-11-10 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:43 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 11:50 +0100, Francis Moreau wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:30 AM Lennart Poettering > > wrote: > > > On Di, 10.11.20 10:28, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com)

Re: [systemd-devel] How can I simply check that a service has been restarted ?

2020-11-10 Thread Francis Moreau
I hope that helps. Thank you however I don't control the type of the restarted units, it can be anything, > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:50 AM Francis Moreau > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:30 AM Lennart Poettering >> wrote: >> > >>

Re: [systemd-devel] How can I simply check that a service has been restarted ?

2020-11-10 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:30 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di, 10.11.20 10:28, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > After restarting a service with "systemctl try-restart ..." I want to > > verify that the se

[systemd-devel] How can I simply check that a service has been restarted ?

2020-11-10 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, After restarting a service with "systemctl try-restart ..." I want to verify that the service has been restarted. How can I reliably do this without using the dbus API ? Thank you -- Francis ___ systemd-devel mailing list

Re: [systemd-devel] 99-default.link which such a high number ?

2020-09-26 Thread Francis Moreau
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020, 17:46 Francis Moreau wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I want to override /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link so I need >> to create a file starting with "99-" prefix.

Re: [systemd-devel] 99-default.link which such a high number ?

2020-09-26 Thread Francis Moreau
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 4:59 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:46 AM Francis Moreau > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I want to override /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link so I need > > to create a file starting with "99-"

[systemd-devel] 99-default.link which such a high number ?

2020-09-25 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I want to override /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link so I need to create a file starting with "99-" prefix. This doesn't seem logical to me because the numbers are supposed to encode the priority however nothing is left to the user if the defaults used is 99. I find more logical

Re: [systemd-devel] Why systemd keeps references on passed sockets ?

2020-09-09 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:41 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di, 08.09.20 17:35, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:38 PM Lennart Poettering > > wrote: > > > > > > "React on the socket close?" — Wha

Re: [systemd-devel] Why systemd keeps references on passed sockets ?

2020-09-08 Thread Francis Moreau
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:38 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > "React on the socket close?" — What do you mean by that? > I mean if my service explicitly calls close() then systemd could stop the socket on its side so its are freed until the service is restarted. I think it is what you described

Re: [systemd-devel] Why systemd keeps references on passed sockets ?

2020-09-06 Thread Francis Moreau
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 12:18 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fr, 04.09.20 21:53, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a service which is activated by a socket unit. When systemd > > passes the (netlink) socket to my ser

[systemd-devel] Why systemd keeps references on passed sockets ?

2020-09-04 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, I have a service which is activated by a socket unit. When systemd passes the (netlink) socket to my service it seems that it still keeps a reference on the socket, at least ss(8) showed this. Is this expected ? If yes can this be prevented ? I'm asking because my service may not need the

Re: [systemd-devel] No DHCP server is started with DHCPServer=yes

2020-05-07 Thread Francis Moreau
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:47 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mi, 06.05.20 23:43, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm running systemd v245 (in the host and in the containers) and I > > have 2 containers whose veth link is c

[systemd-devel] No DHCP server is started with DHCPServer=yes

2020-05-06 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, I'm running systemd v245 (in the host and in the containers) and I have 2 containers whose veth link is connected to a bridge. One container named "c1" uses "DHCPServer=yes" and is supposed to provide an ipv4 address to the second container "c2" but for some reasons it seems that no DHCP

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Francis Moreau
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:26:50AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Francis Moreau
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > you can export and write to a journal file with: &

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Francis Moreau
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > you can export and write to a journal file with: > journalctl -o export ... | /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journal-remote -o > /tmp/foo.journal - > This has the advantage that you can apply any journalctl filter where > the dots

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-07-24 Thread Francis Moreau
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > journalctl -o export ... | /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journal-remote -o > /tmp/foo.journal - > This has the advantage that you can apply any journalctl filter where > the dots are, e.g. '-b'. Thanks ! It's documented in man

[systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-07-24 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, I would like to backup the journal logs for the current boot in a "raw" format so I can reuse it later with "journalctl --file=my-backup". But looking at the different values for "-o" option I can't find the answer. Could anybody give me some clues ? Thanks. -- Francis

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about the default value of NamePolicy=

2018-08-02 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > AFAIK, "onboard" and (hotplug) "slot" names are mutually exclusive, so their > relative ordering isn't that important... but if the firmware marks a device > as on-board *and* also provides a slot number, then it's more likely

[systemd-devel] Question about the default value of NamePolicy=

2018-08-01 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I have a question regarding the default value of NamePolicy= defined in 99-default.link. The value is "NamePolicy=kernel database onboard slot path" Could someone explain me why "onbard" is preferred over "slot" which is preferred over "path" ? Thanks. -- Francis

[systemd-devel] .network has [Link] and there's already .link

2018-07-13 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I dont understand .network has [Link] section whereas network device configuration can also done with .link file. It seems that there's a overlap... what is the rational here ? Thank you in advance. -- Francis ___ systemd-devel mailing list

[systemd-devel] Why "systemctl -H " instead of "ssh -- systemctl"

2018-01-12 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I'm wondering why systemctl has the -H option whereas one can achieve the same by calling "ssh -- systemctl ...". Thanks. -- Francis ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [systemd-devel] What is the recommended way to setup the compose key ?

2017-11-28 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > And where would it get the actual compose definitions from? They have to be > defined in the keymap itself. > on my distro (opensuse Tumbleweed) compose tables and the definition of the compose key can be found

Re: [systemd-devel] What is the recommended way to setup the compose key ?

2017-11-28 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to figure out how I can configure a compose key for the &g

[systemd-devel] What is the recommended way to setup the compose key ?

2017-11-28 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I'm trying to figure out how I can configure a compose key for the consoles. I looked at man localectl and vconsole.conf but haven't found an answer. Could anybody give me some hints ? Thanks. -- Francis ___ systemd-devel mailing list

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about systemd-firstboot

2017-03-09 Thread Francis Moreau
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> So if 'ro' is used, systemd-firstboot is not working. If it's expected >> I think it would worth a note in the documentation. > It's supposed to work, I think. Please open an issue, it'll be better > tracked

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about systemd-firstboot

2017-03-09 Thread Francis Moreau
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > It depends on the command-line parameters: 'ro' and 'rw' both work. > 'rw' is actually recommended if you're using an initramfs. > who is recommending 'rw' ? do you have any pointers ? > Otherwise, an empty

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about systemd-firstboot

2017-03-09 Thread Francis Moreau
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:48:03AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm puzzled about systemd-firstboot service. >> >> In my understanding this s

[systemd-devel] Question about systemd-firstboot

2017-03-09 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I'm puzzled about systemd-firstboot service. In my understanding this service is ran only during the firstboot. The firstboot condition is detected with the presence of /etc/machine-id file. If this file is not present then it's assumed to be a first boot and systemd-firstboot.service is

Re: [systemd-devel] sysv-generator weirdness for shutdown runlevels

2016-05-26 Thread Francis Moreau
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> So let's take an example. Please note that I'm really not sure what's >> the expected beha

Re: [systemd-devel] sysv-generator weirdness for shutdown runlevels

2016-05-25 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello Michael, On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hm, I've already given you the answer on IRC, so I'm not sure why you > ask them again. > Indee and thank you for that. But you also told me that /etc/init.d/rc0.d isn't supported by Debian, and my

[systemd-devel] sysv-generator weirdness for shutdown runlevels

2016-05-25 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I'm starring at a chunk of code of the sysv-generator (shown below) for some while now and I still can't see its purpose. Here's the code taken from src/sysv-generator/sysv-generator.c: static int set_dependencies_from_rcnd(const LookupPaths *lp, Hashmap *all_services) { [...]

Re: [systemd-devel] Why does sysv generator translate Required-Start keyword into an After= ordering dep only ?

2016-03-10 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 08.03.2016 11:33, Francis Moreau пишет: >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 08.03.2016 11:07, Francis Moreau пишет: >>>&

Re: [systemd-devel] Why does sysv generator translate Required-Start keyword into an After= ordering dep only ?

2016-03-08 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 08.03.2016 11:07, Francis Moreau пишет: >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> 07.03.2016 10:04, Francis Moreau пишет: >>>>

Re: [systemd-devel] Why does sysv generator translate Required-Start keyword into an After= ordering dep only ?

2016-03-08 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 07.03.2016 10:04, Francis Moreau пишет: >> Hello, >> >> Sorry for the long delay. >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> >>

Re: [systemd-devel] Why does sysv generator translate Required-Start keyword into an After= ordering dep only ?

2016-03-07 Thread Francis Moreau
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn <lnyk...@redhat.com> wrote: > Francis Moreau píše v Po 07. 03. 2016 v 08:04 +0100: >> Hello, >> >> Sorry for the long delay. >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov < >> arvidj...@gmail.c

Re: [systemd-devel] Why does sysv generator translate Required-Start keyword into an After= ordering dep only ?

2016-03-06 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, Sorry for the long delay. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 26.02.2016 00:55, Francis Moreau пишет: >> >> But now I'm wondering how the following case is handled: a sysinit >> script "a" has "Requi

Re: [systemd-devel] Why does sysv generator translate Required-Start keyword into an After= ordering dep only ?

2016-02-25 Thread Francis Moreau
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Wed, 24.02.16 17:40, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> It seems that the unit generator for sysv init scripts translate >> "Required-Star

[systemd-devel] Why does sysv generator translate Required-Start keyword into an After= ordering dep only ?

2016-02-24 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, It seems that the unit generator for sysv init scripts translate "Required-Start: X" into "After=X" native ordering deps only. I would also have expected it to add the following dependency "Requires=X" too. What am I missing ? Thanks. -- Francis

Re: [systemd-devel] umounting FS happens to be at the same time as shutting down services

2015-11-23 Thread Francis Moreau
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Sun, 22.11.15 15:26, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> While rebooting, It seems to me that shutting down services while >> unmounting some

[systemd-devel] umounting FS happens to be at the same time as shutting down services

2015-11-22 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, While rebooting, It seems to me that shutting down services while unmounting some FS at the same time in an unordered fashion is not a good idea since unmounting a FS can happen before a service using this FS is stopped. Is this expected ? Thanks. -- Francis

Re: [systemd-devel] Property 'MemoryLimit' is RO when using the D-Bus API

2015-11-09 Thread Francis Moreau
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Fri, 06.11.15 18:38, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to change the MemoryLimit property of one the service unit >> running on my

[systemd-devel] Property 'MemoryLimit' is RO when using the D-Bus API

2015-11-06 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, I'm trying to change the MemoryLimit property of one the service unit running on my system by using 'busctl set-property ...' but getting the following error : Property 'MemoryLimit' is not writable. However using 'systemctl set-property' works as expected. I thought that 'systemctl

Re: [systemd-devel] Showing a more accurate version of systemd with the git sha1

2015-10-05 Thread Francis Moreau
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidj...@gmail.com> wrote: > 02.10.2015 19:27, Francis Moreau пишет: >> >> Hello, >> >> I'd like to know if it would be possible to show the git version (the >> one given by git-describe) when using the sy

[systemd-devel] Showing a more accurate version of systemd with the git sha1

2015-10-02 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I'd like to know if it would be possible to show the git version (the one given by git-describe) when using the systemd binaries with --version option. That would be specially usefull when the systemd tree used to build the binary was not a released one. I'm really not an automake stuff

Re: [systemd-devel] Implicit unit dependency on slice might be too weak ?

2015-09-30 Thread Francis Moreau
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Tue, 22.09.15 15:52, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: > >> On Mon, 21.09.15 16:50, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >

Re: [systemd-devel] Implicit unit dependency on slice might be too weak ?

2015-09-24 Thread Francis Moreau
On 09/22/2015 03:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 21.09.15 16:50, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> If a unit depends on a slice, a Wants=machine.slice is automatically >> added to the unit constraints. >> >> Wh

Re: [systemd-devel] Implicit unit dependency on slice might be too weak ?

2015-09-22 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:43 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If a unit depends on a slice, a Wants=machine.slice is auto

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-firstboot skip root password initialisation if /etc/shadow is present

2015-09-22 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:45 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I find odd that systemd-firstboot skips root password in

Re: [systemd-devel] Implicit unit dependency on slice might be too weak ?

2015-09-22 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:52:05AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:14 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi >&g

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-firstboot skip root password initialisation if /etc/shadow is present

2015-09-22 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:45 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gma

Re: [systemd-devel] Implicit unit dependency on slice might be too weak ?

2015-09-22 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:14 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: [...] >>> >> >> But what if the slice fails to start ? >> >> Will t

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-firstboot skip root password initialisation if /etc/shadow is present

2015-09-22 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: [...] >> >> Well during package installation done by the installer, some packages, >> us

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-firstboot skip root password initialisation if /etc/shadow is present

2015-09-22 Thread Francis Moreau
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:35 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau <francis.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> >> w

[systemd-devel] Implicit unit dependency on slice might be too weak ?

2015-09-21 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, If a unit depends on a slice, a Wants=machine.slice is automatically added to the unit constraints. Why is "Requires=machine.slice" not prefered instead ? Thanks. -- Francis ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [systemd-devel] Question related to cgroup and systemd

2015-09-18 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello Lennart, On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > B1;4002;0cOn Fri, 18.09.15 14:11, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to understand how cgroup is used by systemd and

[systemd-devel] Question related to cgroup and systemd

2015-09-18 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, I'm trying to understand how cgroup is used by systemd and having the following behaviour that I don't understand. I've created a slice "myslice.slice" with this resource constraint "MemoryLimit=1024" and started it. I was expecting to find a trace of myslice in /sys/fs/cgroup/memory folder

[systemd-devel] systemd-firstboot skip root password initialisation if /etc/shadow is present

2015-09-18 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, I find odd that systemd-firstboot skips root password init if /etc/shadow exists because AFAICS this file is always part of a minimal rootfs after being setup by an installer. Indeed it's populated during package installation. So I can't see a case where systemd-firstboot would prompt for a

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible confusion with socket activation and daemon own configuration

2015-09-09 Thread Francis Moreau
On 09/08/2015 07:48 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 08/09/15 13:55, Francis Moreau wrote: >> On 09/08/2015 12:09 PM, Richard Maw wrote: >>> I understood that the common configuration for socket activated sshd was to >>> have a sshd.service for if you want it to al

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible confusion with socket activation and daemon own configuration

2015-09-08 Thread Francis Moreau
On 09/07/2015 11:28 AM, Richard Maw wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: >> How is this handled ? Should we put a big warning in sshd_config to hint >> user to configure ListenAddress in sshd.socket in the case socket >> activation is used ?

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible confusion with socket activation and daemon own configuration

2015-09-08 Thread Francis Moreau
On 09/08/2015 12:09 PM, Richard Maw wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:05:05AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: >> On 09/07/2015 11:28 AM, Richard Maw wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: >>>> How is this handled ? Should we pu

Re: [systemd-devel] Delaying device service creation

2015-07-03 Thread Francis Moreau
On 07/03/2015 01:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: B1;4002;0cOn Fri, 03.07.15 13:09, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: That's not an issue really. Since the device will not have any disk label initially, and thus nothing will make use of it, until the mke2fs is finished

Re: [systemd-devel] Delaying device service creation

2015-07-03 Thread Francis Moreau
On 07/03/2015 11:08 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 30.06.15 17:37, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, I have a service 'A' which creates a device 'X' and does some configuring of the device. The device is created in a 'ExecStart=' directive whereas its configuration

Re: [systemd-devel] Delaying device service creation

2015-07-03 Thread Francis Moreau
On 07/03/2015 12:18 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 03.07.15 11:53, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: On 07/03/2015 11:08 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 30.06.15 17:37, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, I have a service 'A' which creates a device

Re: [systemd-devel] Delaying device service creation

2015-07-01 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/30/2015 07:47 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: Options: - Configure it as part of ExecStart if possible. I don't see how is this going to help, sorry. - Configure it using a second .service unit (oneshot), and depend on that one. You meant all services that were depending on the device

[systemd-devel] Delaying device service creation

2015-06-30 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, I have a service 'A' which creates a device 'X' and does some configuring of the device. The device is created in a 'ExecStart=' directive whereas its configuration happens during 'ExecStartPost='. But it seems that as soon as the device is seen by systemd, it creates the corresponding

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about ExecStartPost= and startup process

2015-06-30 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/29/2015 10:05 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: [...] service_sigchld_event() { ... } else if (s-control_pid == pid) { ... if (s-control_command s-control_command-command_next f ==

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about ExecStartPost= and startup process

2015-06-29 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/28/2015 07:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 28.06.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Francis Moreau: On 06/28/2015 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 28.06.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Francis Moreau: Hello, For services with Type=Forking, I'm wondering if systemd proceeds starting follow-up units

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about ExecStartPost= and startup process

2015-06-29 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/28/2015 07:35 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: В Sun, 28 Jun 2015 19:02:57 +0200 Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com пишет: On 06/28/2015 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 28.06.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Francis Moreau: Hello, For services with Type=Forking, I'm wondering if systemd

[systemd-devel] Question about ExecStartPost= and startup process

2015-06-28 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, For services with Type=Forking, I'm wondering if systemd proceeds starting follow-up units when the command described by ExecStart= exits or when the one described by ExecStartPost= exits ? I tried to read the source code to figure this out and it *seems* that the latter is true but I'm

Re: [systemd-devel] Question about ExecStartPost= and startup process

2015-06-28 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/28/2015 01:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 28.06.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Francis Moreau: Hello, For services with Type=Forking, I'm wondering if systemd proceeds starting follow-up units when the command described by ExecStart= exits or when the one described by ExecStartPost= exits

[systemd-devel] Failed to mount a crypted device with 'tmp' option

2015-06-26 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, I'm setting up an encrypted device at boot using cryptsetup. This device is formatted at each boot (I'm using 'tmp' option in /etc/crypttab). Also this device is mounted at boot time (a corresponding entry in /etc/fstab has been made) and is also fsck'ed (fs_passno=2). However it seems that

Re: [systemd-devel] Help needed for optimizing my boot time

2015-06-12 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/11/2015 06:23 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 15:15 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: [...] Does ntpd service really need 'After=network.target', not sure. The 'network online' targets are really just there for ignorant services that don't respond to network events themselves

Re: [systemd-devel] Help needed for optimizing my boot time

2015-06-12 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/12/2015 06:26 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: В Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:56:08 +0200 Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com пишет: On 06/11/2015 06:23 PM, Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 15:15 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: [...] Does ntpd service really need 'After=network.target

[systemd-devel] Help needed for optimizing my boot time

2015-06-11 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I'm interested in optimizing my boot time on my laptop. So I looked at the big picture first: $ systemd-analyze Startup finished in 3.994s (firmware) + 7.866s (loader) + 8.226s (kernel) + 7.921s (userspace) = 28.007s and noticed that the boot time spent in userspace is quite high.

Re: [systemd-devel] Help needed for optimizing my boot time

2015-06-11 Thread Francis Moreau
Hi, On 06/11/2015 12:44 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm interested in optimizing my boot time on my laptop. So I looked at the big picture first: $ systemd-analyze Startup finished in 3.994s

Re: [systemd-devel] Help needed for optimizing my boot time

2015-06-11 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/11/2015 01:40 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com wrote: $ systemd-analyze critical-chain graphical.target @7.921s multi-user.target @7.921s autofs.service @7.787s +132ms network-online.target

Re: [systemd-devel] Help needed for optimizing my boot time

2015-06-11 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/11/2015 02:22 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/11/2015 01:40 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com wrote: $ systemd-analyze critical-chain

Re: [systemd-devel] Help needed for optimizing my boot time

2015-06-11 Thread Francis Moreau
On 06/11/2015 01:40 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com wrote: $ systemd-analyze critical-chain graphical.target @7.921s multi-user.target @7.921s autofs.service @7.787s +132ms network-online.target

Re: [systemd-devel] multi-user.target only wants network.service if I'm doing 'systemct show runlevel3.target'

2014-12-11 Thread Francis Moreau
On 12/10/2014 10:19 AM, Francis Moreau wrote: Hello, On 12/10/2014 07:23 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: On Tuesday 09 December 2014 at 17:25:48, Francis Moreau wrote: Hello Lennart, Thanks for answering ! On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19

Re: [systemd-devel] multi-user.target only wants network.service if I'm doing 'systemct show runlevel3.target'

2014-12-10 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, On 12/10/2014 07:23 AM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote: On Tuesday 09 December 2014 at 17:25:48, Francis Moreau wrote: Hello Lennart, Thanks for answering ! On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote

[systemd-devel] multi-user.target only wants network.service if I'm doing 'systemct show runlevel3.target'

2014-12-09 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, I've a very weird behaviour with systemd 217: # systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service # systemctl show -p Wants runlevel3.target | grep network.service Wants= ... network.service ... # systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service Wants=...

Re: [systemd-devel] multi-user.target only wants network.service if I'm doing 'systemct show runlevel3.target'

2014-12-09 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello Lennart, Thanks for answering ! On 12/09/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 09.12.14 11:19, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello, I've a very weird behaviour with systemd 217: # systemctl show -p Wants multi-user.target | grep network.service

[systemd-devel] gummiboot can't be installed on ESP which is soft RAID1 metadata=0.9 partition

2014-04-14 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello, gummiboot install fails when ESP is MD RAID1 device using metadata 0.9 or 1.0. I don't think using such RAID for ESP would lead to issue. Is there any reason gummiboot doesn't want to be installed on such partition ? Thanks. ___ systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] gummiboot can't be installed on ESP which is soft RAID1 metadata=0.9 partition

2014-04-14 Thread Francis Moreau
On 04/14/2014 06:16 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 14.04.14 18:01, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello, gummiboot install fails when ESP is MD RAID1 device using metadata 0.9 or 1.0. I don't think using such RAID for ESP would lead to issue. Is there any reason

Re: [systemd-devel] gummiboot can't be installed on ESP which is soft RAID1 metadata=0.9 partition

2014-04-14 Thread Francis Moreau
On 04/14/2014 06:38 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Francis Moreau francis.m...@gmail.com wrote: On 04/14/2014 06:16 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 14.04.14 18:01, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: gummiboot install fails when ESP is MD RAID1

Re: [systemd-devel] gummiboot can't be installed on ESP which is soft RAID1 metadata=0.9 partition

2014-04-14 Thread Francis Moreau
On 04/14/2014 08:11 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 14.04.2014 18:16, schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Mon, 14.04.14 18:01, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello, gummiboot install fails when ESP is MD RAID1 device using metadata 0.9 or 1.0. I don't think using such RAID for ESP