Re: [systemd-devel] systemd log_debug

2021-06-10 Thread František Šumšal
On 6/10/21 2:08 AM, Ted Toth wrote: What do I need to do to enable log_debug logging in systemd (on centos7), edit /etc/systemd/system.conf and set LogLevel=debug? If so, how do I get systemd to reread the config file (kill -HUP 1)? Where do I view the messages, journalctl -l? If you want to

Re: [systemd-devel] Random branch in github.com/systemd/systemd

2020-01-02 Thread František Šumšal
On 1/2/20 5:13 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 9:08 AM Lennart Poettering > wrote: >>> If possible, it would probably be wise to restrict access for pushing >>> new branches like this. >> >> Hmm, how would we do that? Any suggestion? Happy to restrict that, but >> not sure how to

Re: [systemd-devel] website

2019-11-18 Thread František Šumšal
Hello, I'd say calling it a 'terrible website' is somewhat subjective. I'm not a fan of single-page websites or websites which won't load with a plethora of other javascript libraries. Also, as the person, who 'nominated' systemd for having a 'terrible website' said in the thread you linked -

Re: [systemd-devel] perform fsck on everyt boot

2019-11-11 Thread František Šumšal
Hello, FWIK passno > 0 in /etc/fstab configures only order in which the fsck is performed, not the frequency. To configure the frequency as well, I'd recommend taking a look at `man systemd-fsck@.service`, especially the `fsck.mode=force` kernel command line parameter, which should do exactly

Re: [systemd-devel] /etc/fstab obsolete?

2019-08-28 Thread František Šumšal
On 8/28/19 9:33 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > systemd in SLES 12 is causing endless frustration here: > > Yesterday I was migrating some filesystems to a new device (multipath, > MD-RAID, LVM, filesystem, mountpoints, etc.), updating /etc/fstab and other > files as needed. > After

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: systemd prerelease 243-rc2

2019-08-26 Thread František Šumšal
On 8/26/19 9:43 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: Mantas Mikulenas schrieb am 23.08.2019 um 05:55 in > Nachricht > : >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019, 16:38 Ulrich Windl > >> wrote: >> >> systemd tag bot schrieb am >>> 22.08.2019 >>> um >>> 13:56 in Nachricht

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread František Šumšal
On 7/3/19 8:37 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: >>>> František Šumšal schrieb am 02.07.2019 um 18:51 in > Nachricht : > >> >> On 7/2/19 4:36 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Paul Menzel >>> : >>>>

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-02 Thread František Šumšal
On 7/2/19 4:36 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Paul Menzel > : >> Reading the output above, I can see, why the people contact this mailing >> list. > > I agree here. While we do have `support-url` which distros can > override, Apparently not all of them do.

Re: [systemd-devel] CentOS CI test suites failing

2019-05-28 Thread František Šumšal
there's over 20 jobs to run, it might take a good portion of the night (it's a midnight here), so please be patient :-) I'll check the status once again in the morning and try to go through any unexpected failures (hopefully there won't be any). On 5/28/19 10:35 PM, František Šumšal wrote

Re: [systemd-devel] CentOS CI test suites failing

2019-05-28 Thread František Šumšal
This might take a little bit longer than anticipated, as the Jenkins slave also ran out of space. On 5/28/19 10:02 PM, František Šumšal wrote: > Hello! > > Thanks for the heads up. This was unfortunately caused by two simultaneous > issues: > > 1) CentOS CI pool ran ou

Re: [systemd-devel] CentOS CI test suites failing

2019-05-28 Thread František Šumšal
Hello! Thanks for the heads up. This was unfortunately caused by two simultaneous issues: 1) CentOS CI pool ran out of pre-installed machines 2) I forgot to handle such situation in the systemd CentOS CI code :-) After giving the CentOS CI a few hours to get back on its tracks, I'll shortly

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Arbitrary restrictions (e.g. for RuntimeDirectory)

2019-05-14 Thread František Šumšal
On 5/14/19 8:39 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: >>>> František Šumšal schrieb am 13.05.2019 um 17:13 in > Nachricht <064ac942-a4d7-b547-0705-22f3262f5...@sumsal.cz>: >> On 5/13/19 8:20 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> >> That's actually not true. The argument for `sys

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Arbitrary restrictions (e.g. for RuntimeDirectory)

2019-05-13 Thread František Šumšal
On 5/13/19 8:20 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> "systemd‑analyze verify" exists. Since a long long time. > > Not really: You can't verify a unit file while it's not "installed". Comare it > to validating an XML file, for example. > That's actually not true. The argument for `systemd-analyze verify`

Re: [systemd-devel] Bugfix release(s)

2019-01-16 Thread František Šumšal
On 1/14/19 4:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 14.01.19 10:59, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote: > > I'd love to see some more CI hookup with Arch and Debian for example > (right now there is zero) or even just a git preview package set or so > that interested people can test.