Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie writes:
Michał Zegan wrote on 31/07/15 12:37:
The thing is, if the user does it, then after he leaves, the process
is running under the user's session.
If I log in to my own account, su to the other user and start the
process and then logout, this process,
Perhaps if there is an issue with polkit (or permissions in general) we should
always print something like, Unable to perform action without privileges; try
again with sudo. in addition to the polkit message.
On July 14, 2015 12:59:53 AM PDT, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Tue, 21.04.15 15:22, Spencer Baugh (sba...@catern.com) wrote:
Also, trivial static IP configuration is seldom sufficient, you at
least need to also provide DNS configuration, and if you don't use
DHCP or something similar then you need
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Wed, 22.04.15 13:41, Spencer Baugh (sba...@catern.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
Well, again, I doubt that configuration exclusivel at
interface-creation-time will be useful for more than the most trivial
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Tue, 21.04.15 10:58, Spencer Baugh (sba...@catern.com) wrote:
The MAC address is currently generated as hash value from the
container name, it hence should be completely stable already as long
as you keep using the same name
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Mon, 20.04.15 22:50, Spencer Baugh (sba...@catern.com) wrote:
Yes, in that case, it is of course very simple, but it is not at all
configurable. I have one thing and one thing only that I want to
configure: The IP address that a given
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Mon, 20.04.15 15:25, Spencer Baugh (sba...@catern.com) wrote:
So far I'd recommend running networkd on the host and in the
container. If you run it on the host, then it will automatically
configure the hos side of each of nspawn's veth links
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Mon, 20.04.15 13:01, Spencer Baugh (sba...@catern.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
Hmm, so you say the initial connection does not work but triggers the
container, but the subsequent one will?
Not quite
be done; it seems very important for
serious use of containers. Perhaps networkd could be used to do
something here? What is the best practice?
Thanks,
Spencer Baugh
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http
Quoting Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (2014-12-18 04:08:32)
On 12/18/2014 04:00 AM, Spencer Baugh wrote:
When printing the status of a unit, open a connection to the session bus
and query PackageKit for the package that the unit file belongs
to. Print it if PackageKit knows
Quoting Kay Sievers (2014-12-18 15:04:22)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 07:09:34PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/18/2014 06:44 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/18/2014 06:36 PM, Zbigniew
When printing the status of a unit, open a connection to the session bus
and query PackageKit for the package that the unit file belongs
to. Print it if PackageKit knows.
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 32
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git
12 matches
Mail list logo
