HI
I updated systemd from 208 to 229 and since then I can’t get working my
calendar timers.
I spent hours trying to understand why it is not working….
Running „systemctl list-timers” for not working calendar timer shows:
———
NEXT LEFTLAST
Hi *
I updated my system and one aspect of update was systemd update from 208 to 229.
After this update my custom udev rules dealing with USB as stopped working.
After investigation the problem look following to me:
1.insert USB HDD
2.udev rule starts, creates mount dir, mounts USB dev. All
On 07/01/14 22:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
That's what I'd guess too. Does is get fixed if you insert 'sleep 1' in
mysql-check.sh before it exits?
This seems likely because the output suggests that the script is short-lived.
Yes. It helps.
On 06/01/14 21:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
journalctl -o verbose for mysqld-check.sh
Zbyszku,
Here is output for 'journalctl SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER=mysqld-check.sh -o verbose'
Sat 2014-01-04 23:32:07.364159 CET
Hi *
I have question regarding logging with help of systemd journal.
I have mysql daemon unit which so some housekeeping after daemon start
(see below).
My question is: what is best method to query journal to see _ALL_
execution output of mysqld.service unit?
Kicking 'journalctl --unit
Hi *
Is there possibility to configure systemd journal to behave like cyclic
buffer with given buffer size?
Currently I see only rotation mechanism. Issue with rotation is that
just after rotation, journal is almost empty and user don't have access
to old log data.
I have already many
On 10/16/13 9:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 09:19:43PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
Maybe we should disable [re]mounting / by systemd at all?
All systemd does, is call 'mount -o remount /'. I have no idea how you end
up with a read-only filesystem.
As a work-around
On 10/17/13 4:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Perhaps a dumb question but are you 100% certain that
systemd-remount-fs.service has been run? I've not seen any debug about
it so far on this thread:
systemctl status systemd-remount-fs.service
Col
Col,
Console reports Starting Remount Root and
On 10/17/13 7:59 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Warpme at 17/10/13 18:15 did gyre and gimble:
On 10/17/13 4:27 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Perhaps a dumb question but are you 100% certain that
systemd-remount-fs.service has been run? I've not seen any debug about
it so far
Hi,
I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
Sys is PXE booted disk-less appliance with rootfs based on overlayfs.
Currently I can PXEboot, successfully switch root from initrd to
overlayfs based root, systemd starts and executes many of it's units.
Unfortunately user units are
On 10/16/13 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:18:12PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
Hi,
I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
Sys is PXE booted disk-less appliance with rootfs based on overlayfs.
Currently I can PXEboot, successfully switch root
On 10/16/13 7:40 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 07:22:28PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
On 10/16/13 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:18:12PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
Hi,
I want to switch init system from SysV to systemd-196.
Sys is PXE
On 10/16/13 9:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:31:02PM +0200, Warpme wrote:
Zbyszku,
I add remount just after pivot_root. No change.
I don't get one thing: why exactly such script works OK for SysV ?
If it works for SysV - it means script leaves / in rw mode
Hi,
I want to build sytemd in cross-build environment.
One from many needed dependencies is libcap which is really old and
isn't cross-build friendly.
It looks like libcap-ng is kind of successor and I can build this lib in
my cross-build environment.
Is there any way to build systemd with
step you crosscompile libcap like:
make CC=$TARGET_CC CFLAGS=$TARGET_CFLAGS lib=/lib -C libcap libcap.a
greetings
Stephan
Am 04.10.2013 17:12, schrieb Warpme:
Hi,
I want to build sytemd in cross-build environment.
One from many needed dependencies is libcap which is really old and
isn't cross
On 11/20/12 3:55 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
SYSTEMD_WANTS=ext-usb-backup@.myth.backup\x20connected.service
This looks alright, doesn't it?
Are you saying that this service is not pulled in even though this field
showed up on the device?
I found where issue is.
When developing udev rule I
Well,
Things pretend to be simple seems to be not simple
After 2 days of fighting with issue I have to ask for help.
I want to kick systemd service when usb HDD is plugged.
As started service needs to know HDD label I wan to use templates.
Here is what it goes:
udev rule:
SUBSYSTEM==block,
On 11/18/12 5:54 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
Just as a general observation, I don't think you even need to delve into
udev rules to make all this work as systemd handles device mounts
internally.
You can simply create a .mount unit for your drive such that when it is
inserted it is mounted
On 11/18/12 3:37 PM, Mirco Tischler wrote:
I don't really have an idea, but here are some things you could check
additionally:
Does systemd create a .device unit? And if yes is it active/plugged?
And does it have the correct Wants=ext-usb-backup.service attribute?
Does udevadm info
On 11/15/12 9:05 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
You can use systemd to instantiate a service on device discovery (or
run a daemon that listens to events from udev on old init systems).
Check how bluetooth, cups printers, usbmux, ... is handled:
TAG+=systemd,
Hi *
Sometime ago upgraded my ArchLinux (kernel3.3.8) server to systemd195.
Today I discovered that my backup procedure fails. It was working OK
with previous systemd.
Forgive me if this forum is wrong place to ask such questions, but as
udev is now part of systemd - I decided to ask here...
On 11/15/12 9:05 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Warpme war...@o2.pl wrote:
Sometime ago upgraded my ArchLinux (kernel3.3.8) server to systemd195.
Today I discovered that my backup procedure fails. It was working OK with
previous systemd.
Forgive me if this forum
On 3/15/12 3:05 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 08.03.12 17:37, David Lambert (d...@lambsys.com) wrote:
On 03/08/2012 03:07 PM, Warpme wrote:
I haven't set any limits in journal.conf - so maybe I should set
them. Unfortunately there is no man for this file (or I miss
something) - so I
On 3/6/12 2:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 20.02.12 23:35, Olav Vitters (o...@vitters.nl) wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:12:55PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Now, of course, the journal shouldn't crash in the first place. This bug
is still something to fix, but so far nobody
On 3/6/12 2:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 20.02.12 23:35, Olav Vitters (o...@vitters.nl) wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:12:55PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Now, of course, the journal shouldn't crash in the first place. This bug
is still something to fix, but so far nobody
On 2/20/12 11:35 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:12:55PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Now, of course, the journal shouldn't crash in the first place. This bug
is still something to fix, but so far nobody managed to get me a bt of
this. if the journal itself crashes a
On 2/22/12 7:06 PM, Warpme wrote:
On 2/20/12 11:35 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:12:55PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Now, of course, the journal shouldn't crash in the first place. This
bug
is still something to fix, but so far nobody managed to get me a bt
On 2/1/12 8:37 PM, Chris Paulson-Ellis wrote:
On 01/02/12 19:26, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 01.02.12 19:13, Chris Paulson-Ellis (ch...@edesix.com) wrote:
On 01/02/12 19:07, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 01.02.12 18:54, Chris Paulson-Ellis (ch...@edesix.com) wrote:
Is there some
Hi,
I have question related to latest systemd39 newly introduced journald.
I'm on ArchLinux (kernel 3.0.18). Recently - after upgrade from systemd37-39
I'm observing decreased system stability.
It manifests as random services outages.
So far during last days I had 2 such cases.
In both of
Hi *
I just moved my ArchLinux based server from systemd37 to 39.
Basically all went well.
For successful logging via rsyslog I do following:
1.symlink /lib/systemd/system/rsyslog.service to
/etc/systemd/system/rsyslog.service
2.added in rsyslog.conf entry $SystemLogSocketName
Hi,
I just upgraded systemd 35 to 37.
Milion thx for devs for fixing bug39824 !
My distro is Archlinux.
system boots/works OK, but after upgrade I have one annoying issue:
Output msgs about services status now is printed to currently active VT.
If I have 5 of them and initially 1st was active -
Dear systemd Devs,
Forgive me this type of question but I need rough date estimates for schedule
planning of systemd integration with my project.
-What are plans to implement functionality 5\ described in:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2011-August/003263.html
Situation
Hi,
I have problem with understanding following systemd behaviour and need
assistance of somebody knowledgeable in systemd config area:
Context:
daemon1 is server for application1
I want to have situation where:
1\systemctl start application1 also starts daemon1
2\systemctl stop daemon1 also
On 8/2/11 1:02 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.07.11 15:20, warpme (war...@o2.pl) wrote:
Zbyszek,
Thx for replay.
You touch exactly the point.
You can use more than one ExecStartPost. E.g.
ExecStartPost=sleep 10
ExecStartPost=systemctl try-restart proc2
This way you remove
Hi,
I really like systemd concept.
I want to use systemctl to control other unit from given unit.
I'm on systemd-29
Example:
unit1:
ExecStartPre=systemctl restart service2.service
Issuing systemctl restart unit1.service gives hang on this command (I
have to terminate manually systemctl)
While
35 matches
Mail list logo
