Re: [systemd-devel] Creating executable device nodes in /dev?

2020-11-19 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 08:17:08AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Hi udev people- > > The upcoming Linux SGX driver has a device node /dev/sgx. User code > opens it, does various setup things, mmaps it, and needs to be able to > create PROT_EXEC mappings. This gets quite awkward if /dev is

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 247-rc2

2020-11-12 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:36:01PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi there > > Am Do., 12. Nov. 2020 um 11:58 Uhr schrieb systemd tag bot > : > > > > A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the > > tarball here: > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Sponsoring systemd

2020-10-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 10:57:18AM +0200, Jan Keller wrote: > Hey systemd project, > > I am trying to get in touch with someone regarding a potential sponsorship > (details at > https://security.googleblog.com/2019/12/announcing-updates-to-our-patch-rewards.html). > Who is best to talk to? In

Re: [systemd-devel] Ensuring that a unit starts before any networking

2020-06-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Mark Rogers wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 at 11:06, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > You should use Before=network-pre.target, Wants=network-pre.target. > > Thanks, tried that but still not working: > > $ journalctl -

Re: [systemd-devel] Ensuring that a unit starts before any networking

2020-06-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 09:34:00AM +0100, Mark Rogers wrote: > I have tried multiple approaches so far but by current service file > looks like this: > > [Unit] > Description=Config generation from DB > Before=networking.service You should use Before=network-pre.target, Wants=network-pre.target.

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-level]: how to config and enable systemd help to create coredump file when the process crashes ?

2020-05-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:22:35PM +0800, www wrote: > Dear all, > > > how to config and enable systemd help to create coredump file when the > process crashes ? See http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/coredumpctl.html. Zbyszek ___

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-hostnamed/hostnamectl and transient hostname change

2020-04-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:00:36PM +0200, Thomas HUMMEL wrote: > On 4/27/20 11:51 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > Hello, thanks for your answer. > > >On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 6:17 PM Thomas HUMMEL > >mailto:thomas.hum...@pasteur.fr>> > >wrote: > > > >1. why does the transient hostname change

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd vulnerability detection

2020-04-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:53:23AM +0530, Amish wrote: > > On 29/04/20 1:00 am, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >Please see: > > > >https://systemd.io/SECURITY/ > > > >... > > > >Lennart > > On a side note, phrasing on the site needs to be changed. https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/15632 ?

Re: [systemd-devel] user service conflict and confusion

2020-04-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:53:36AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Greetings, > > I am hitting a confusing scenario with my system. I am running 245.4-2 > (Debian). > > I have a user service, mpd, which is failing to start. It is enabled: > > $ systemctl --user is-enabled mpd > enabled > > And

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC] pstore: options to enable kernel writing into the pstore

2020-03-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 01:05:22PM -0500, Eric DeVolder wrote: > >Below is a proposal for adding a couple of settings to the systemd pstore > >service so that it can enable the kernel parameters that allow the > >kernel to write into the pstore. Hi, please submit this as PR. > > From

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 245-rc2

2020-03-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 07:43:22AM +, systemd tag bot wrote: > A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the > tarball here: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/archive/v245-rc2.tar.gz It's mostly bufixes, but still 146 commits since -rc1. The plan is

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-daemon documentation clarification

2020-03-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 01:38:54PM +0100, Łukasz Niemier wrote: > > AFAIK both stdout and stderr even get attached to the same journal pipe by > > default, so they should also be interpreted in the same way. > > > > The description of SyslogLevelPrefix= in systemd.exec(5) also says: "This > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-02-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 01:12:08PM +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 3:23 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:48:53AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > On 01/03/20 at 11:45am, Dave Young wrote: > > > > On 01/02/20

Re: [systemd-devel] lunch before devconf

2020-01-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Dear all, > > we'll be having an open meeting in Brno on Thursday, Jan 23rd, 2020, > before the DevConf.cz conference. Everyone interested in systemd > development is invited. The plan is to meet for lunch around 1 PM, and > then go the Red Hat

[systemd-devel] lunch before devconf

2020-01-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Dear all, we'll be having an open meeting in Brno on Thursday, Jan 23rd, 2020, before the DevConf.cz conference. Everyone interested in systemd development is invited. The plan is to meet for lunch around 1 PM, and then go the Red Hat office afterwards for discussion and planning. We should be at

Re: [systemd-devel] Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-01-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:48:53AM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > On 01/03/20 at 11:45am, Dave Young wrote: > > On 01/02/20 at 09:02am, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:21:26AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > > > > Some component, like Syst

Re: [systemd-devel] Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-01-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 03:29:26PM -0500, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Kairui Song writes: > > > What I'm trying to do is reduce the initramfs size used for kdump. > > Kdump loads a crash kernel and kdump initramfs image in a prereseved > > memory region, which get booted when current kernel crashed

Re: [systemd-devel] Minimize systemd for kdump's initramfs

2020-01-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:21:26AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote: > Some component, like Systemd, have grown by a lot, here is a list of > the size of part of binaries along with the binaries they required in > F31: > /root/image/bin/systemctl > 20M . > /root/image/usr/bin/systemctl > 20M . >

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Why does initrd-parse-etc.service re-start initrd-fs.target?

2019-12-14 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Dec 14, 2019 at 11:58:37AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 09.12.2019 10:06, Ulrich Windl пишет: > >> > >> After real root is mounted daemon-reload re-runs fstab generator which > >> parses real root /etc/fstab and may pull mount points from it. > > > > I wonder: Are there realistic

Re: [systemd-devel] No error even a Required= service does not exist

2019-11-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 06:13:17PM +0200, Uoti Urpala wrote: > On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 15:19 +0200, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > > Requires=xyz.service > > > > > > produces no complaint and starts the service even if there is no > > > xyz.service > > > Is this the normal behavior or can I

Re: [systemd-devel] Please reopen issue #12506

2019-11-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:41:20AM +, Marcos Mello wrote: > Although util-linux's fstab.d work has stalled, there is still systemd code > that needs porting to libmount. See Karel's last comment: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12506 Reopened. Zbyszek

Re: [systemd-devel] Dead link in the documentation of the Journal File Format on freedesktop.org

2019-11-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:12:55PM +, kein name wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to report a dead link in the documentation of the Journal File > Format on freedesktop.org[1]. > The link[2] goes to gmane.org which is dead, it should probably use your own > mailing list archive[3]. Thanks,

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 06:30:33PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 21.10.19 17:50, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > In principle, the watchdog for services is nice. But in practice it seems > > be bring only grief. The Fedora bugtracker is

[systemd-devel] getting ready for v244

2019-10-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi everyone, I think it's time to get ready for a v244-prerelease. Currently, 8 issues are open on https://github.com/systemd/systemd/milestones/v244 without a PR. I'll be working on the remaining issues and hope to release an -rc1 late this week or early next. If there is stuff I should

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 02:56:55PM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:45:32AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:35:13AM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:35:13AM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:34:45PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote: > > > I am curious Zbigniew of how you find out if the coredum

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
ases where the kernel is dead-locked internally, and e.g. open() or modprobe() never returns. For those cases it might be useful to get the backtrace, but actually killing the process and/or storing the coredump is useful. Zbyszek > > Umut > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:51 PM Zbi

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Vito Caputo wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 05:50:44PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > In principle, the watchdog for services is nice. But in practice it seems > > be bring only grief. The Fedora bugtracker is full of au

Re: [systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 09:54:31AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:50:44 + > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > In principle, the watchdog for services is nice. But in practice it seems > > be bring only grief. The Fedora bugtracker is full

[systemd-devel] is the watchdog useful?

2019-10-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
In principle, the watchdog for services is nice. But in practice it seems be bring only grief. The Fedora bugtracker is full of automated reports of ABRTs, and of those that were fired by the watchdog, pretty much 100% are bogus, in the sense that the machine was resource starved and the

Re: [systemd-devel] cannot unsubscribe from this list

2019-10-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:08:24PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > I initiated an unsubscribe from this web page: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/systemd-devel > > That created a confirmation email, that I replied to. Yeah, that doesn't work. Use the web interface: >

Re: [systemd-devel] Replacement for JoinControllers

2019-10-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 09:34:09AM +0200, azu...@pobox.sk wrote: > Hi guys. > > recently, we upgraded one of our servers from Debian Stretch > (systemd version 232-25+deb9u12) to Debian Buster (systemd version > 241-7~deb10u1). Soon after, we found out that setting > 'JoinControllers' is not

Re: [systemd-devel] Unload disabled units

2019-09-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 03:12:22AM +, Daniel Duong wrote: > Hi, > > I have a 2 template units: 1 for a service and 1 for a socket. Each > instance is a version of my web application. > > After a successful deploy, I stop and disable the old version and I > enable the new one: >

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd243rc2, sysd-coredump is not triggered on segfaults

2019-09-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 07:55:20PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Maybe it's something unique to gnome-shell segfaults, that's the only > thing I have crashing right now. But I've got a pretty good reproducer > to get it to crash and I never have any listings with coredumpctl. > > process segfaults

Re: [systemd-devel] When will my timer next run?

2019-08-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 06:04:22PM -0700, Kenneth Porter wrote: > I've created my service timer with the following: > > [Timer] > # wait a bit after boot to let our victim catch up with its work > OnBoot=13m This needs to be OnBootSec=13m. (systemd-analyze verify is your friend in cases like

Re: [systemd-devel] logind: 242~rc2 break VT/tty switching on Fedora 31

2019-08-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 04:08:39PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > I already filed a github issue for $subject: > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/13437 > > But I'm not sure how close github issues are watched hence this email. It > would be nice if we can get this fixed for

Re: [systemd-devel] sd-boot on Fedora 30?

2019-08-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:43:43AM -0700, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to get sd-boot to work on Fedora 30, made some progress > but not fully there yet... > > First I found my partition GPT type in /boot was incorrect and bootctl was > trying to use /boot/efi instead.

Re: [systemd-devel] nspawn blocks sync_file_range on arm

2019-08-19 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:02:35PM +0100, Steve Dodd wrote: > ARM has two sync_file_range syscalls, sync_file_range and sync_file_range2. > The former is apparently not used, and glibc calls the latter whenever a > userspace program calls sync_file_range. I'm guessing systemd-nspawn > doesn't know

Re: [systemd-devel] lto issues

2019-08-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:34:36AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am Di., 6. Aug. 2019 um 09:26 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > : > > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > today I tried comp

Re: [systemd-devel] lto issues

2019-08-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi, > > today I tried compiling systemd v242 (on Debian sid) once using lto > (-Db_lto=true) and once without lto (-Db_lto=false). > > The lto build took approximately twice as long on my laptop (using > dpkg-buildpackage, which

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 08:46:58AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 08:17:01AM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > The kernel will use the lower-numbered available fd, so there's lot of > > "reuse" of the same numbers happening. This strace means that between > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:52:07AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:26:50AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:45 AM Zbigniew Jędr

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:26:50AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:45 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szme

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:37:31AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:36:41AM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 14:56 -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > > > I see, between 13:49:30 and 13:50:01, I see 25 'successful' calls > > > for close(), e.g.: > > > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-08-01 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:08 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > you can export and write to a journal file with: > > journalctl -o export ... | /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journal-remote -o &g

Re: [systemd-devel] KExecWatchdogSec NEWS entry needs work

2019-07-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 08:32:44AM +1000, Clinton Roy wrote: > Particularly the following sentence: > > This option defaults to off, since it depends on drivers and > software setup whether the watchdog is correctly reset again after > the kexec completed, and thus for the general case not clear

Re: [systemd-devel] Backup the current boot logs in raw format

2019-07-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:48:40PM +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to backup the journal logs for the current boot in a > "raw" format so I can reuse it later with "journalctl > --file=my-backup". > > But looking at the different values for "-o" option I can't find the

Re: [systemd-devel] "Unknown lvalue '' in section 'Service'"

2019-07-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:46:59AM +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:34 AM Ulrich Windl < > ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I noticed that a line of "===" in "[Service]" cases the message " > > Unknown lvalue '' in section 'Service'". > >

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-07-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:08:43AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 10:44:14PM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > That's ancient... 228 was released almost four years ago. > > That's the joy of using a commercial Linux distribution; they tend > to be conservative

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-07-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:51:36AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 07:37:19AM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > It's a bug report as any other. Writing a meaningful reply takes time > > and effort. Lack of time is a much better explanation than ressentiments.

Re: [systemd-devel] OFFLIST Re: systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-07-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:05:50PM +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:28 PM Brian Reichert wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 11:21:13AM +0100, > > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org wrote: > > > Hi Brian > > > > > > I feel embarrassed at having recommended you to join

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd's connections to /run/systemd/private ?

2019-07-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 09:57:44AM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote: > At $JOB, on some of our SLES12 boxes, our logs are getting swamped > with messages saying: > > "Too many concurrent connections, refusing" Please always specify the systemd version in use. We're not all SLES users, and even if

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?

2019-07-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Zbigniew Jedrzejewski-Szmek schrieb am 09.07.2019 um > 10:05 > in Nachricht <20190709080527.gk17...@in.waw.pl>: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:49:32AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> It seems "‑‑state=failed" is

Re: [systemd-devel] Is "systemctl status --state=failed" expected to fail silently?

2019-07-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 08:49:32AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > It seems "--state=failed" is being ignored silently for "systemctl status" > (in version 228). Is this by design? Nope. In 242-1092+ it seems to work fine. Zbyszek ___

Re: [systemd-devel] connection failure

2019-07-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 03:39:04PM +0200, ABDUL MAJITH wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to use the Docker in GNS3, when I try to launch it show the > error as follows, > > -- The start-up result is done. > Jul 02 15:21:55 reccon.irisa.fr systemd[1]: docker.service: Start request > repeated too

Re: [systemd-devel] swap on zram service unit, using Conflicts=umount

2019-06-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:55:27AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 24.06.19 13:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > > So for tmpfs mounts that don't turn off DefaultDependencies= we > > > implicit add in an After=swap.target or

Re: [systemd-devel] swap on zram service unit, using Conflicts=umount

2019-06-24 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 02:11:03PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sa, 22.06.19 10:42, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've got a commit to add 'Conflicts=umount.target' to this zram > > service based on a bug comment I cited in the comment. But I'm not > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Building systemd

2019-06-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Jun 09, 2019 at 05:58:16PM -0300, Leonardo Akel Daher wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to make a Pull Request for systemd, but I am struggling running > the tests locally (before making any code changes). I get the error of the > attached image when running "ninja -C build/ test". Hi,

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd spends much time about 30 seconds for every unit

2019-06-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 03:48:58AM +, 程 书意 wrote: > Hi all, > > I am working on virtualization on armv8 platform and encountered a complex > problem. From the below boot log, we can find: > > 1. Every unit init need about 30 seconds. > 2. status_printf function doesn't work. [no

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and chroot()

2019-06-04 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:42:35PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > We are adding some new functionality to the NFS server that > will make it a bit more container friendly... > > This new functionality needs to do a chroot(2) system call. > This systemcall is failing with EPERM due

Re: [systemd-devel] How to get hardware watchdog status when using systemd

2019-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 01:50:53PM +0200, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: > Hi Zbyszek, > > On 28.05.2019 13:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >What kind of information are you after? > > One interesting statistic I'd like to see changing is the time when > the wa

Re: [systemd-devel] How to get hardware watchdog status when using systemd

2019-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:59:27PM +0200, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: > Hello, > > I've enabled "RuntimeWatchdogSec=30" in /etc/systemd/system.conf > (after reading excellent "systemd for Administrators" series [0]). > > Before enabling that "wdctl" printed nice statistics but now it only >

Re: [systemd-devel] Node.js sd-notify module visibility

2019-05-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:43:27PM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > Yup, go for it. Done. Zbyszek > On 23/05/2019 12:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:27:56PM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > >> Yeah of course, didn't even think. I'm happy wi

Re: [systemd-devel] Node.js sd-notify module visibility

2019-05-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
3, 2019 at 12:05 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-

Re: [systemd-devel] Node.js sd-notify module visibility

2019-05-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
n 23/05/2019 10:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-notify" available on GitHub > >> (https://github.com/roryr

Re: [systemd-devel] Node.js sd-notify module visibility

2019-05-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:25:02AM +0100, Rory Bradford wrote: > Hi, > > I actively maintain a Node.js module "sd-notify" available on GitHub > (https://github.com/roryrjb/sd-notify) and npm > (https://www.npmjs.com/package/sd-notify) that has been contributed to > and is being used by others. As

Re: [systemd-devel] Does "systemctl daemon-reload" discard service information?

2019-05-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 03:36:28PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Hi! > > I have had the effect that a "systectl status" before and after a > "daemon-reload" is different, while the service in question wasn't restarted: Whenever making a report like this, always include the exact systemd version

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Re: "bad" status for genersated target; why?

2019-05-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:04:28PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > >>> Lennart Poettering schrieb am 16.05.2019 um 10:29 > in > Nachricht <20190516082910.GA24042@gardel-login>: > > On Do, 16.05.19 08:55, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni‑regensburg.de) > wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> After having

Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl list all possible (including unloaded) services

2019-05-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 09:27:17AM -0600, Roger Pack wrote: > Hello, I'm trying to answer this question: > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/517872/systemctl-list-all-possible-including-disabled-services > > Basically, I have a my_service.service that is disabled, I wish I > could "see

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-coredump[2529]: Process 2326 (xfwm4) of user 1000 dumped core maybe because of lightdm[2482]: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file

2019-04-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 09:32:57PM +0200, linuxfr...@gmx.at wrote: > Hi Zbyszek, > > > i've already did this. > > It started after desktop freezes here: > > https://forum.manjaro.org/t/xfce-desktop-freezes-after-automated-screen-lock-manjaro-18-0-4-illyria/84717/12 > > which were solved, but

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-coredump[2529]: Process 2326 (xfwm4) of user 1000 dumped core maybe because of lightdm[2482]: gkr-pam: unable to locate daemon control file

2019-04-29 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 09:22:30PM +0200, linuxfr...@gmx.at wrote: > Hi, > > i do not know who is the correct person / mailing list, to ask for this one. > > 1) screen-lock locks the screen  (OK) > > 2) screensaver comes and screen is going to be black.  (OK) > > 3) Everytime i unlock my

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 242-rc1

2019-04-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 07:55:42AM +, systemd tag bot wrote: > A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the > tarball here: Please ignore this one. The version number was not bumped properly. v242-rc2 has already been tagged. Zbyszek

Re: [systemd-devel] WantedBy=default.target

2019-03-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:31:18AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am Do., 7. März 2019 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Lennart Poettering > : > > > > On Do, 07.03.19 10:30, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > Looks like quite a few services use > > > WantedBy=default.target > > >

[systemd-devel] planned v241 release

2019-01-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi everyone, 241 will be released soon. Current list of outstanding tickets [1]: "23 wireguard peers hang systemd-networkd" #11404 opened 3 days ago by darkk network: wait for kernel to reply ipv6 peer address #11428 (needs review) "Bump numbers for v241" #11387 (release mechanics) "Add

Re: [systemd-devel] Bugfix release(s)

2019-01-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 01:09:16PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 14.01.19 11:26, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote: > > > > > > Well, that sounds as if you want to volunteer as release engineer? ;-) > > > > > > Thing is, we are understaffed. I too have a wishlist of things I'd >

Re: [systemd-devel] Requires and After

2019-01-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 07:14:10PM +1100, Michael Chapman wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:22 AM James Feeney wrote: > > > systemd has two different classes of "dependencies": 1) "activation" > > > dependencies, and 2) "ordering" dependencies. >

Re: [systemd-devel] Requires and After

2019-01-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 12:05:46PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > Hi, > > Evverx suggested I ask here @ https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11284 > It's about Requires and After. I think a unit in Requires should imply > that unit in After too, otherwise the requirement isn't really met.

[systemd-devel] systemd 240 released

2018-12-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Steve Ramage, Susant Sahani, Sven Joachim, Sylvain Plantefève, Tanu Kaskinen, Tejun Heo, Thiago Macieira, Thomas Blume, Thomas Haller, Thomas H. P. Andersen, Tim Ruffing, TJ, Tobias Jungel, Todd Walton, Tommi Rantala, Tomsod M, Tony

[systemd-devel] systemd hackfest talking points

2018-10-03 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, we had a systemd hackfest/talkfest last Sunday in Berlin as part of AllSystemdGo 2018. Here is a copy of the doc we used to discuss the technical & documentations topics: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12mWXZem7IOc9u-Db04Cy-NPi39LijiiMlTqX-0DYO98/edit (I tried to convert this to text,

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2] meson: use the host architecture compiler/linker for src/boot/efi

2018-09-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 01:19:27PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 10:40:28 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Do, 27.09.18 17:17, Helmut Grohne (hel...@subdivi.de) wrote: > > > > > cross building systemd to arm64 presently fails, because the build > > > system uses

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd behavior during shutdown

2018-09-19 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:01:33AM +, Tiwari, Hari Sahaya wrote: > Hi, > > I am facing one issue with systemd where systems socket is not opening a new > connection during shutdown. > I get below logs, > > Sep 12 20:01:32 jara2 systemd[1]: mytestX.socket: Incoming traffic > Sep 12 20:01:32

Re: [systemd-devel] When is a unit "loaded"?

2018-07-12 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:52:12PM -0700, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hey Daniel! > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:16 PM Daniel Wang wrote: > > I have a unit, say foo.service, on my system that's in > > /usr/lib/systemd/system, but disabled by preset. > > Not that it matters, but presets don't

[systemd-devel] upcoming systemd-239 release

2018-06-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi all, we plan to release systemd-239 wednesday-ish. On Friday we merged the last batch of new features, and until the release, only bug fixes, cleanups, and documentation improvements should be merged. Please test and report any regressions. I'll be making builds for Fedora in copr (*):

Re: [systemd-devel] Running a service *just* before unmounting filesystems

2018-06-13 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 04:55:27PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 12-06-18 19:11, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >On Di, 12.06.18 11:33, Hans de Goede (hdego...@redhat.com) wrote: > >>AFAIK the service actually doing the updates is supposed to call > >>systemctl reboot --force when it is

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] detect-virt: do not return exit failure code when the state is none

2018-05-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:25:08AM +0200, Franck Bui wrote: > Hi Joey, > > On 05/25/2018 09:33 AM, joeyli wrote: > > > > Do you have good idea to inhibit the exit failure to avoid the subsequent > > activity be blocked? > > > > For the context the actual rule is: > > SUBSYSTEM=="memory",

Re: [systemd-devel] option to wait for pid file to appear

2018-05-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:12:10PM +0200, Igor Bukanov wrote: > On 17 May 2018 at 11:58, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > > Have you tried without the PIDFile= setting at all? > > As far as I can see that breaks live updates that nginx supports where > it starts a new process and

Re: [systemd-devel] GPL and unit/conf files

2018-05-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 02:21:30PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > Hi, > > logind.conf has a GPL header, as do things like getty@.service. An LGPL header actually, *library*. All you need to do, is to keep the possibility to modify/destribute that .conf file. > If I needed to make changes to

[systemd-devel] github merge rules update

2018-05-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
To systemd repo committers: an investigation in https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8665 done by filbranden showed that github's "rebase & merge" button works better than the "squash & merge" version. The authorship and original timestamps on the commit are not mangled. Hence, let's mostly

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-tmpfiles duplicate line for path, ignoring

2018-05-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 09:01:06PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Hi, > > I see this in the journal > > May 09 14:36:06 f28h.local systemd-tmpfiles[3273]: > [/etc/tmpfiles.d/suspendfix.conf:7] Duplicate line for path > "/proc/acpi/wakeup", ignoring. > > This file contains: > > w

Re: [systemd-devel] Implementing networkd d-bus interface

2018-05-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 01:34:58PM -0500, Thad Phetteplace wrote: > Hi systemd developers, > > I'm wondering what the state of development is on the d-bus interface > for systemd-networkd. Currently the interface appears to be minimal, > but I've also seen comments that a full featured API is

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH bluez] hid2hci: Fix udev rules for linux-4.14+

2018-05-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:06:38PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Since commit 1455cf8dbfd0 ("driver core: emit uevents when > device is bound to a driver") the kernel started emitting > "bound" and "unbound" uevents which confuse the hid2hci

Re: [systemd-devel] [ty...@mit.edu: Re: Linux messages full of `random: get_random_u32 called from`]

2018-05-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:23:33PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: > El 02-05-2018 a las 6:25, Lennart Poettering escribió: > >On Di, 01.05.18 18:08, Vito Caputo (vcap...@pengaru.com) wrote: > > >Or maybe this confusion is just another iteration of the stuff > >dicussed here?

Re: [systemd-devel] automount EFI system partition to /efi fails

2018-04-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mi, 25.04.18 07:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > > [6.291607] f28h.local systemd[715]: Followed symlinks /efi → /efi. > > > [6.291643] f28h.local systemd[715]:

Re: [systemd-devel] automount EFI system partition to /efi fails

2018-04-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:47:24PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/DiscoverablePartitionsSpec/ > *The ESP used for the current boot is automatically mounted to /efi (or > /boot as fallback),* > > systemd-238-7.fc28.1.x86_64 > > I've commented out the

Re: [systemd-devel] automount EFI system partition to /efi fails

2018-04-25 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 07:48:13AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:47:24PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/DiscoverablePartitionsSpec/ > > *The ESP used for the current boot is automatically

Re: [systemd-devel] About supporting relative values (e.g. 50%) in configuration

2018-03-09 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:48:54PM +0800, ChenQi wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to know if systemd community thinks that adding support for > relative values in configuration is a good idea. > > I found a related patch and discussion in >

Re: [systemd-devel] Create a target unit to start & stop a group of services

2018-03-07 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 03:07:30AM +, 林自均 wrote: > Anyone? > > John Lin > > 林自均 於 2018年2月27日 週二 下午6:20寫道: > > > Hi Jérémy, > > > > Thank you, but I read the section "Mapping of unit properties to their > > inverses" in the man page > >

[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v238

2018-03-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
, Sylvain Plantefève, Thomas Blume, Thomas Haller, Vito Caputo, Yu Watanabe, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek, Марко М. Костић (Marko M. Kostić) — Warsaw, 2018-03-05 ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-sysusers

2018-02-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 10:21:17AM -0800, Johannes Ernst wrote: > > > On Feb 4, 2018, at 21:56, Michael Chapman wrote: > > > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, Johannes Ernst wrote: > >> It appears systemd-sysusers does not create home directories. On the other > >> hand, it picks

Re: [systemd-devel] hash context not closed.

2018-02-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 09:17:52AM +0100, Stef Bon wrote: > Same error here: > (gcry_md_open without gcry_md_close) > line 901 in src/resolve/resolved-dns-sec.c > while in the same file at 1227 it's done the good way. Indeed. PR submitted: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/8100. Zbyszek

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >