On Mon, 01.06.15 08:25, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Wouldn't that work?
For dbus activation it would work but other services can still
activate the service through systemd.
But why is that a problem? If daemons explicitly request another
service by invoking
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Thu, 28.05.15 13:56, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov
dimitri.j.led...@intel.com wrote:
On 28 May 2015 at 12:56, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
On Thu, 28.05.15 13:56, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 27.05.15 13:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked
service?
Well, so far our thinking was that if the vendor wants
Hi,
I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked service?
Vendor default masked service has advantages like:
- systemctl start won't work
- dbus activation won't work
It is common that an embedded system doesn't use packages, rather it
ships everything in monolithic
On Tue, 26.05.15 11:53, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we have a way to provide vendor default masked
service?
Well, so far our thinking was that if the vendor wants to make a unit
completely unavailable he should simply not ship it in the first
