2015-05-26 19:08 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Tue, 26.05.15 18:52, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
>
>> > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/tree/debian/patches/Fix-paths-in-man-pages.patch?h=experimental-220
>> >
>> > Not enthusiastic about the idea. But th
On Tue, 26.05.15 18:52, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> > I really don't see how the xorg.conf.d drop-in should be
> > fedora-specific. That's an upstream X11 thing, and we just picked a
> > name for the file and that's it.
> >
> > Are you saying Debian patched out supported for /et
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 18:36 +0200]:
> /etc/locale.conf is not a fedoraism. It has not existed on Fedora
> before we introduced it. It's a systemd'ism if you so will: we looked
> at where the distros configured these things and came to the
> conclusion that all them were weird and nothing w
On Tue, 26.05.15 18:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
> Hey Lennart,
>
> Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 17:31 +0200]:
> > But note that upstream is supposed to be non-redhat centric, and is
> > supposed to support non-merged /usr. If it's really about that, I#d be
> > inetersted to
Hey Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 17:31 +0200]:
> But note that upstream is supposed to be non-redhat centric, and is
> supposed to support non-merged /usr. If it's really about that, I#d be
> inetersted to know what these patches are about, and maybe we can move
> some upstream.
There'
