26.05.2015 21:52, Martin Pitt wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 18:36 +0200]:
That said, I think even better would be to maybe make the support for
this generic in systemctl: instead of explicitly invoking chkconfig or
update-rcd, maybe we can just make systemctl invoke some fixed binary
Hello all,
Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-05-26 15:12 +0100]:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Can we perhaps flip that around? I did a make dist/port our
patches/build packackages/run our tests round on May 11, but that was
before most of the recent hiccups landed in
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:26, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello all,
Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-05-26 15:12 +0100]:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Can we perhaps flip that around? I did a make dist/port our
patches/build packackages/run our
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 16:43 +0200]:
Well, I had been trying to stabilize things since 3 weeks before the
release
Ah, that's roughly when I did my last build packages from upstream
trunk test, and indeed it looked fairly well back then.
I didn't announce this on the ML though, but I
BOn Tue, 26.05.15 16:58, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
50 non-backport patches? That sounds like a lot...
It's not that bad, most of them are trivial, like tweaking tmpfiles.d
or some extra historic udev rules. We have quite a bunch of patches to
get rid of Fedora/RedHat-isms
