On Wed, 27.05.15 11:52, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-27 11:42 +0200]:
Well, but let's not forget that a major part of the issues popping up
actually were committed weeks ago.
Actually, no. As I said, on May 11 most everything was working just
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-27 11:42 +0200]:
Well, but let's not forget that a major part of the issues popping up
actually were committed weeks ago.
Actually, no. As I said, on May 11 most everything was working just
fine, the udev regressions landed very late. The path_is_mount_point()
On Tue, 26.05.15 20:51, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:17:07PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-27 12:56 +0200]:
Sounds good. I actually did this twice (not sure if you saw my IRC
pings about that) I just didn't do it at the right time. I think
this would have helped to find most issues indeed (except for the
keys-from-name.gperf thing, but meh -- happens
Hey Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-27 12:26 +0200]:
* Regularly test make dist, as nobody does that during regular
development.
Well, no.
You just said before that we (distros) need to check tarball
generation/build more often. So I'm a bit confused by the no (but
see below).
On Wed, 27.05.15 12:37, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey Lennart,
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-27 12:26 +0200]:
* Regularly test make dist, as nobody does that during regular
development.
Well, no.
You just said before that we (distros) need to check tarball
On 27 May 2015 at 10:52, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-27 11:42 +0200]:
Well, but let's not forget that a major part of the issues popping up
actually were committed weeks ago.
Actually, no. As I said, on May 11 most everything was working just
fine,
On 27 May 2015 at 12:26, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
I use make distcheck regularly during regular development, and
that's how I generate the final tarball.
What about generating a preview tarball before tagging, and letting us
downstreams a couple of days to test it
On Wed, 27.05.15 13:03, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-27 12:56 +0200]:
Sounds good. I actually did this twice (not sure if you saw my IRC
pings about that) I just didn't do it at the right time. I think
this would have helped to find most issues
On Wed, 27.05.15 12:42, Marc-Antoine Perennou (marc-anto...@perennou.com) wrote:
On 27 May 2015 at 12:26, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
I use make distcheck regularly during regular development, and
that's how I generate the final tarball.
What about generating a
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:17:07PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Well, we don't do point releases in systemd.
In systemd git we already
2015-05-27 2:51 GMT+02:00 Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com:
The fact of the matter is, the last 2 releases of systemd have been
brown bag releases. Neither 219 nor 220 are useable as the tarballs are
provided. v220 doesn't even build in a large number of configurations.
v218 wasn't quite as
2015-05-26 17:57 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
There's a stable git tree maintained by Zbigniew, Lukas and friends,
that carries backports for the stable releases. Most vendors should
consider following that repo I figure.
I try to help the backporting business by tagging
On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
which shows that a important project like systemd playing on the same level
as the linux kernel
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 18:22 +0200]:
Well, I certainly have enough things to do. We have trouble keeping up
with he amount of work that we already get, and I have no intention to
make things even more complex by maintaining multiple branches for
you, if the distros already do this
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Well, we don't do point releases in systemd.
In systemd git we already have now the change that makes sd-bus and
sd-event public APIs, hence v221 is
On Fri, 22.05.15 17:28, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello,
while packaging 220, I got the audit related build failure that was
already reported [1], but also another one:
I think this has been fixed now with Tom's commit
ee3c31bf69746c5afc764c3d0337feec1bf25f0e contributed
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 16:06 +0200]:
I think this has been fixed now with Tom's commit
ee3c31bf69746c5afc764c3d0337feec1bf25f0e contributed my Marc-Antoine.
Confirmed this morning. Sorry, I should have followed up to the ML
immediately. Thanks Tom!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com)
wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Well, we don't do
On 26 May 2015 at 15:10, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-05-26 16:06 +0200]:
I think this has been fixed now with Tom's commit
ee3c31bf69746c5afc764c3d0337feec1bf25f0e contributed my Marc-Antoine.
Confirmed this morning. Sorry, I should have followed up to
Am 26.05.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 15:12, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote:
Or will there be a v220.1 release shortly with releasy fix-ups?
Well, we don't do point releases in systemd.
and why?
just because don't do is not enough
On Tue, 26.05.15 19:13, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald
Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
which shows that a important project like systemd playing on the same level
as the linux kernel *just needs* point releases, there is a reason that the
kernel has
Am 26.05.2015 um 18:22 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 17:57, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 26.05.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 26.05.15 16:39, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
which shows that a important project like systemd
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 05:28:01PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello,
while packaging 220, I got the audit related build failure that was
already reported [1], but also another one:
| In file included from ../src/udev/udev-builtin-keyboard.c:29:0:
| ./src/udev/keyboard-keys-from-name.h: In
25 matches
Mail list logo
