Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-24 Thread Daniel Mack
On 10/24/2014 03:40 AM, Chris Bell wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Lennart Poettering -all processes of the session are terminated. If -the last concurrent session of a user ends, his -user systemd instance will be

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-24 Thread Chris Bell
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org wrote: Could you please send a patch that does that change? Here you go! From 517599692ed194156e8277e310270f4407d0d124 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Bell cwb...@mail.usf.edu Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:22:36 -0400 Subject:

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 24.10.14 05:32, Chris Bell (cwb...@mail.usf.edu) wrote: manvolnum5/manvolnum/citerefentry, all processes of the session are terminated. If -the last concurrent session of a user ends, his -

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-23 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 23.10.14 10:19, Daniel Mack (zon...@kemper.freedesktop.org) wrote: paraOn logout, this module ensures the following:/para orderedlist -listitemparaIf this is enabled, all -processes of the session are

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-23 Thread Alex Gaynor
Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net writes: hmm, why their? THat's wrong. It's the user's instance, hence must be singular. Or is this about his vs. her? If so I find their quite confusing, and if so, at least his/her would be better. Hi Lennart, In English it's perfectly valid

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-23 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 24.10.14 00:26, Alex Gaynor (alex.gay...@gmail.com) wrote: Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net writes: hmm, why their? THat's wrong. It's the user's instance, hence must be singular. Or is this about his vs. her? If so I find their quite confusing, and if so, at least

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-23 Thread Alex Gaynor
Lennart Poettering lennart at poettering.net writes: Well, the sentence is complicated enough as it is. By sticking to a singular form it appears clearer to me what is meant here. I am fine with changing this to her/his if his alone is really is too bad, but their appears a lot more

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-23 Thread Chris Bell
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Well, the sentence is complicated enough as it is. On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote: Switching to her/his would be a definitely improvement. What if we reworded it to avoid

[systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] man/pam_systemd.xml

2014-10-23 Thread Johnathan Zefran
The use of a gendered pronoun like his constitutes a rather baffling piece of sexism and misogyny on Lennarts part, considering he overwrote a valid gender-neutral pronoun. I am disappointed by this, so I would like to propose the use of the gender-neutral zir pronoun. Tech has a big problem with