2015-06-19 16:11 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> I'm very disappointed (once again) how this release was handled.
> Lot's of last minute changes. Especially
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/293
> really sucks.
While I'm still disappointed how this issue was handled and I still
find the argume
Kay Sievers wrote on 20/06/15 20:49:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 6:08 PM, cee1 wrote:
>> 2015-06-20 2:06 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering :
>>> On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>>>
Heya!
It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h a
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 6:08 PM, cee1 wrote:
> 2015-06-20 2:06 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>>
>>> Heya!
>>>
>>> It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h and
>>> sd-event.h public. (A blog story on sd
2015-06-20 2:06 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
>> Heya!
>>
>> It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h and
>> sd-event.h public. (A blog story on sd-bus and how to use it will
>> follow shortly.)
>
> Th
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> Heya!
>
> It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h and
> sd-event.h public. (A blog story on sd-bus and how to use it will
> follow shortly.)
The blog story is online now:
http://0pointer.net/blog/the
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> Guys let's try to be constructive here...
>
> This time it shouldn't be too painful for downstreams since the revert
> was the last patch to the man subtree so just a git revert of that
> should get your trees to the state you need to
Guys let's try to be constructive here...
This time it shouldn't be too painful for downstreams since the revert
was the last patch to the man subtree so just a git revert of that
should get your trees to the state you need to get v221 packages for
Debian and Ubuntu. In that sense, I think we're s
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:15, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
* If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
same service name, and the user executes
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:40, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2015-06-19 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Fri, 19.06.15 16:29, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> > If something is not in shape we'll revert it. Regardless of the
> >> > general merits of the patch set: t
2015-06-19 16:38 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Fri, 19.06.15 16:29, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> > If something is not in shape we'll revert it. Regardless of the
>> > general merits of the patch set: this one actually broke stuff, it
>> > was incomplete. Either you make the m
В Fri, 19 Jun 2015 16:15:03 +0200
Reindl Harald пишет:
>
>
> Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > * If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
> >same service name, and the user executes "systemctl enable"
> >for it (or a related
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:15, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > * If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
> > same service name, and the user executes "systemctl enable"
> > for it (or a rel
Am 19.06.2015 um 16:06 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
* If there's a systemd unit and a SysV init script for the
same service name, and the user executes "systemctl enable"
for it (or a related call), then this will now enable both
(or execute the related
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:11, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I'm very disappointed (once again) how this release was handled.
> Lot's of last minute changes.
I disagree. We only made bugfixes in the last days, except maybe one
patch (that came with a lot of unit tests). That's how this work
On Fri, 19.06.15 16:21, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> All this talk about getting downstream patches upstream and then last
> minute reverts without a proper justitification. WTF.
"reverts"? Plural? Which ones are you referring to excluding that man
page path thing?
Lennart
--
Lenn
All this talk about getting downstream patches upstream and then last
minute reverts without a proper justitification. WTF.
2015-06-19 16:11 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> I'm very disappointed (once again) how this release was handled.
> Lot's of last minute changes. Especially
> https://github.com/
I'm very disappointed (once again) how this release was handled.
Lot's of last minute changes. Especially
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/293
really sucks.
Not amused, not amused at all.
2015-06-19 16:06 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> Heya!
>
> It's primarily a bugfix release, but we al
Heya!
It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h and
sd-event.h public. (A blog story on sd-bus and how to use it will
follow shortly.)
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-221.tar.xz
Reminder: Note again that the git repository and bug tracking moved to
github
18 matches
Mail list logo
