Hi
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Lennart Poettering"
>> To: "Stephen Gallagher"
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:13:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Ad
- Original Message -
> From: "Lennart Poettering"
> To: "Stephen Gallagher"
> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:13:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add VARIANT as a standard value for
> /etc/os-release
>
> On Tue, 05.05.15 08:52, Step
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 08:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Some distributions (such as Fedora) are using the VARIANT field to
> indicate to select packages which of several default configurations
> they should be using. For example, VARIANT=Server provides a
> different default firewall configur
Originally, I was only thinking that the parseable field mattered,
but you're right. There's value in having a human-presentable
field here as well. Updated patch attached.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.f
Some distributions (such as Fedora) are using the VARIANT field to
indicate to select packages which of several default configurations
they should be using. For example, VARIANT=Server provides a
different default firewall configuration (blocking basically
everything but SSH and the management cons
On Tue, 28.04.15 17:10, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> +
> +VARIANT=
> +
> +
> +A string identifying a specific variant or edition of the
> +operating system. This may be interpreted by other packages in
> +order to determine a diverg
Some distributions (such as Fedora) are using the VARIANT field to
indicate to select packages which of several default configurations
they should be using. For example, VARIANT=Server provides a
different default firewall configuration (blocking basically
everything but SSH and the management cons
