Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters

2017-06-29 Thread Daniel Wagner
On 06/28/2017 06:06 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote: I think it was first packaged into systemd, and then it was split out to help those who want

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters

2017-06-28 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:21:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 28.06.17 09:06, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodriguez

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters

2017-06-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 28.06.17 09:06, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote: > > > >> > Do you know how systemd developers feel about the issue

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters

2017-06-28 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote: > >> > Do you know how systemd developers feel about the issue (CCed)? Given >> > that it seems to dominate in data center OSes now I'm

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters

2017-06-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 28.06.17 00:24, Luis R. Rodriguez (mcg...@kernel.org) wrote: > > Do you know how systemd developers feel about the issue (CCed)? Given > > that it seems to dominate in data center OSes now I'm slightly worried > > having to push Big Linux Vendors to package some seemingly > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] firmware: wake all waiters

2017-06-27 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:25:53PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:39:42 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > The problem is that advanced NICs are quite programmable [1] and > > > depending on use case one may want to load different firmware files. > > > > Right, so