On Fri, 05.12.14 16:06, Olivier Brunel (j...@jjacky.com) wrote:
> With DIRECTION_UP (i.e. navigating backwards) in generic_array_bisect() when
> the
> needle was found as the last item in the array, it wasn't actually processed
> as
> match, resulting in entries being missed.
>
> https://bugs.f
Hi,
I just verified that this patch also fixes
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84867 .
On 12/05/2014 10:06 AM, Olivier Brunel wrote:
> With DIRECTION_UP (i.e. navigating backwards) in generic_array_bisect() when
> the
> needle was found as the last item in the array, it wasn't actua
With DIRECTION_UP (i.e. navigating backwards) in generic_array_bisect() when the
needle was found as the last item in the array, it wasn't actually processed as
match, resulting in entries being missed.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86855
---
This was a good excuse for me to dive in
