Hi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Olivier Brunel j...@jjacky.com wrote:
On 08/11/14 18:21, David Herrmann wrote:
sd-event does not allow multiple handlers for a single signal. However,
logind sets up signal handlers for each session with VT_PROCESS set (that
is, it has an active
sd-event does not allow multiple handlers for a single signal. However,
logind sets up signal handlers for each session with VT_PROCESS set (that
is, it has an active controller). Therefore, registering multiple such
controllers will fail.
Lets make the VT-handler global, as it's mostly trivial,
On Mon, 11.08.14 18:21, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote:
+/*
+ * SIGRTMIN is used as global VT-release signal, SIGRTMIN + 1 is used
+ * as VT-acquire signal. We ignore any acquire-events (yes, we still
+ * have to provide a valid signal-number for
On Mon, 11.08.14 18:46, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
With this code you block, but do not ignore SGRTMIN+1. Now, rtsigs
actually are implemented in a queue, multiple instances of the same
signal might be queued up. If you simply block dispatching, then the
queue will
Hi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 11.08.14 18:46, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
With this code you block, but do not ignore SGRTMIN+1. Now, rtsigs
actually are implemented in a queue, multiple instances of the
On 08/11/14 18:21, David Herrmann wrote:
sd-event does not allow multiple handlers for a single signal. However,
logind sets up signal handlers for each session with VT_PROCESS set (that
is, it has an active controller). Therefore, registering multiple such
controllers will fail.
Lets make
