On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Brandon Philips bran...@ifup.co wrote:
This is a better approach that was suggested by Mike and ack'd by Tom.
Some DHCP servers gives you a netmask of 255.255.255.255 so the gateway is not
routable. Other DHCP client implementations look through the existing
Hi,
Do we also need to drop the route within dhcp_lease_lost()?
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Brandon Philips bran...@ifup.co wrote:
This is a better approach that was suggested by Mike and ack'd by Tom.
Some DHCP
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
u...@tezduyar.com wrote:
Hi,
Do we also need to drop the route within dhcp_lease_lost()?
Indeed, good catch.
Cheers,
Tom
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
This is a better approach that was suggested by Mike and ack'd by Tom.
Some DHCP servers gives you a netmask of 255.255.255.255 so the gateway is not
routable. Other DHCP client implementations look through the existing routes to
figure out if they should add an explicit host route. See below for
