Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: don't enter a second SIGTERM/SIGKILL cycle if no ExecStopPost= process is defined

2013-06-21 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 08:45:35AM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > It won't help if the main process is still there and there is no new > process to kill. > --- > > Hi, > > The second SIGTERM/SIGKILL is to kill ExecStopPost= if necessary, right? In > that case, this is a better solution. Can any

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: don't enter a second SIGTERM/SIGKILL cycle if no ExecStopPost= process is defined

2013-06-11 Thread Michael Olbrich
It won't help if the main process is still there and there is no new process to kill. --- Hi, The second SIGTERM/SIGKILL is to kill ExecStopPost= if necessary, right? In that case, this is a better solution. Michael src/core/service.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff