On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:13:48AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 21.05.13 15:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:10:55PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> > > Just calling service_enter_dead() does not kill any processes.
> >
On Tue, 21.05.13 15:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:10:55PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> > Just calling service_enter_dead() does not kill any processes.
> > As a result, the old process may still be running when the new one is
> > star
> Just calling service_enter_dead() does not kill any processes.
> As a result, the old process may still be running when the new one is
started.
Thx for the fast response and alternative patch. I tested it in my
environment as well and it works as expected killing the processes
without execut
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:10:55PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> Just calling service_enter_dead() does not kill any processes.
> As a result, the old process may still be running when the new one is
> started.
> After a watchdog failure the service is in an undefined state.
> Using the normal sh
Just calling service_enter_dead() does not kill any processes.
As a result, the old process may still be running when the new one is
started.
After a watchdog failure the service is in an undefined state.
Using the normal shutdown mechanism makes no sense. Instead all processes
are just killed and
