Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net writes:
On Tue, 28.10.14 13:14, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Thu, 23.10.14 16:39, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, I think the generator should already treat the option fields the
same way
On Thu, 23.10.14 16:39, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, I think the generator should already treat the option fields the
same way as I want it to work in the long run, i.e. just read it from
fstab and write it 1:1 into the unit's Options= string.
I am hacking up
On Tue, 28.10.14 13:14, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Thu, 23.10.14 16:39, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, I think the generator should already treat the option fields the
same way as I want it to work in the long run, i.e. just read
Instead of a dedicated Discard option, use more general Options. When
the swapon command learns -o, it will be possible to pass the value of
Options as is. The code now assumes that the only possible value to
Options is related to discard.
On Thu, 23.10.14 14:58, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
-static int property_get_discard(
+static int property_get_options(
sd_bus *bus,
const char *path,
const char *interface,
@@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ static int property_get_discard(
