On Tue, 25.03.14 01:17, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 24.03.14 17:48, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> > To me it really appears as if "_netdev" is the right thing to u
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 24.03.14 17:48, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> To me it really appears as if "_netdev" is the right thing to use here,
> and we really should advertise its use for cases like this, and close
> the bu
On Mon, 24.03.14 17:48, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> On Mon, 24.03.14 17:38, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > Po 24. březen 2014, 17:12:30 CET, Lennart Poettering napsal:
> > >On Mon, 24.03.14 15:55, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > >
> > >Ar
On Mon, 24.03.14 19:17, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >Since "glusterfs" is a FUSE file system I am pretty sure it is called
> >"fuse.gluster" or so in /proc/self/mountinfo, right?
>
> You are right, it shows up as fuse.glusterfs there. So any
> suggestions? And just drop the patch i
Po 24. březen 2014, 18:49:34 CET, Lennart Poettering napsal:
On Mon, 24.03.14 18:03, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Well, but how exactly do those lines look in fstab? Are you sure they
have "glusterfs" in the fstype field? And not "fuse.glusterfs" or so?
From RH Knowledgebase (aga
On Mon, 24.03.14 18:03, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >Well, but how exactly do those lines look in fstab? Are you sure they
> >have "glusterfs" in the fstype field? And not "fuse.glusterfs" or so?
>
> From RH Knowledgebase (again sorry not a public link)
> https://access.redhat.com/
Po 24. březen 2014, 17:48:53 CET, Lennart Poettering napsal:
On Mon, 24.03.14 17:38, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Po 24. březen 2014, 17:12:30 CET, Lennart Poettering napsal:
On Mon, 24.03.14 15:55, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Are you sure this does what you think it
On Mon, 24.03.14 17:38, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Po 24. březen 2014, 17:12:30 CET, Lennart Poettering napsal:
> >On Mon, 24.03.14 15:55, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >Are you sure this does what you think it does? I mean, AFAIR glusterfs
> >is a fuse FS, and
Po 24. březen 2014, 17:12:30 CET, Lennart Poettering napsal:
On Mon, 24.03.14 15:55, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Are you sure this does what you think it does? I mean, AFAIR glusterfs
is a fuse FS, and hence will nevershow up like this in fstab nor
/proc/self/mountinfo... Or am I mi
On Mon, 24.03.14 15:55, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Are you sure this does what you think it does? I mean, AFAIR glusterfs
is a fuse FS, and hence will nevershow up like this in fstab nor
/proc/self/mountinfo... Or am I missing something?
> ---
> src/shared/util.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file
---
src/shared/util.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/util.c b/src/shared/util.c
index dd67c22..6f73387 100644
--- a/src/shared/util.c
+++ b/src/shared/util.c
@@ -1500,7 +1500,8 @@ bool fstype_is_network(const char *fstype) {
"nfs\0
11 matches
Mail list logo
