On 11/05/15 11:15 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 11/05/15 17:07 +0200, Pavel Odvody wrote:
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 10:32 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 09/05/15 00:31 +0200, Pavel Odvody wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:33 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 08/05/15 11:31 +1000, Daurnimator wrote:
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 10:32 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 09/05/15 00:31 +0200, Pavel Odvody wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:33 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 08/05/15 11:31 +1000, Daurnimator wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 01:46, Pavel Odvody podv...@redhat.com wrote:
- To access the V2
On 11/05/15 17:07 +0200, Pavel Odvody wrote:
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 10:32 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 09/05/15 00:31 +0200, Pavel Odvody wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:33 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 08/05/15 11:31 +1000, Daurnimator wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 01:46, Pavel Odvody
On 09/05/15 00:31 +0200, Pavel Odvody wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:33 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 08/05/15 11:31 +1000, Daurnimator wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 01:46, Pavel Odvody podv...@redhat.com wrote:
- To access the V2 registry we need to send a special User-Agent
docker/1.6.0
Is
On 08/05/15 11:31 +1000, Daurnimator wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 01:46, Pavel Odvody podv...@redhat.com wrote:
- To access the V2 registry we need to send a special User-Agent
docker/1.6.0
Is this really required?
Can we request they change something server side?
I would have to double
On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 14:33 -0400, Vincent Batts wrote:
On 08/05/15 11:31 +1000, Daurnimator wrote:
On 8 May 2015 at 01:46, Pavel Odvody podv...@redhat.com wrote:
- To access the V2 registry we need to send a special User-Agent
docker/1.6.0
Is this really required?
Can we request
On 8 May 2015 at 01:46, Pavel Odvody podv...@redhat.com wrote:
- To access the V2 registry we need to send a special User-Agent
docker/1.6.0
Is this really required?
Can we request they change something server side?
___
systemd-devel mailing list
Hi,
the attached series of patches add support for pulling from V2 docker
registries, so let me break down first what happened to the format since
V1
- Image is now defined by a JSON manifest
- contains fields like name, tag, schemaVersion ...
- and fsLayers - which is an array of sha256
