On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> I won't promise anything, but I'll give it a try later tonight.
Thanks!
> It is a bit frightening under what kind of attention you people have to
> work: Even this tiny patch made it onto phoronix and I just got my first
> flame about ruini
I won't promise anything, but I'll give it a try later tonight.
It is a bit frightening under what kind of attention you people have to
work: Even this tiny patch made it onto phoronix and I just got my first
flame about ruining Linux.
___
systemd-devel
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> no, root=tmpfs rootfstype=tmpfs does *not* work without my patch. I
> had thought it should, too, and I did try.
>
> fstab-generator was silently ignoring root= since "tmpfs" is not a
> device. So no mount unit for /sysroot...
>
>
Hi Tom,
no, root=tmpfs rootfstype=tmpfs does *not* work without my patch. I
had thought it should, too, and I did try.
fstab-generator was silently ignoring root= since "tmpfs" is not a
device. So no mount unit for /sysroot...
Since fstab-generator did evaluate mount.usr* which did point to a
re
For overlayfs you need to check overlayfs and overlay.
24 марта 2015 г. 1:52 пользователь "Tobias Hunger"
написал:
> This allows for stateless systems.
> ---
> src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c | 21 +
> src/shared/util.c | 30 +
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> Hi Tobias and Zbigniew,
>
> This already went in, but I was just looking at it again.
>
> Is there any reason the kernel commandline handling must be treated
> differently here than the fstab handling? We already support
> deviceless mounts (
Hi Tobias and Zbigniew,
This already went in, but I was just looking at it again.
Is there any reason the kernel commandline handling must be treated
differently here than the fstab handling? We already support
deviceless mounts (obviously) when specified in fstab without the need
for any whiteli
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:48:15PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:59:20AM +0100, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > This wouldn't work if fstype was NULL. We also have a list of network
> >
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:59:20AM +0100, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > This wouldn't work if fstype was NULL. We also have a list of network
> > filesystems,
> > whic I assume don't require a device, and we can consult this list
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> This wouldn't work if fstype was NULL. We also have a list of network
> filesystems,
> whic I assume don't require a device, and we can consult this list instead of
> including
> it here. I pushed the patch with those changes.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:52:59AM +0100, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> This allows for stateless systems.
> ---
> src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c | 21 +
> src/shared/util.c | 30 ++
> src/shared/util.h | 1 +
This allows for stateless systems.
---
src/fstab-generator/fstab-generator.c | 21 +
src/shared/util.c | 30 ++
src/shared/util.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/fsta
12 matches
Mail list logo
