Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 4/5] fsckd: check if plymouth is running before attempting connection

2015-03-16 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com wrote: Le 10/03/2015 11:44, Lennart Poettering a écrit : On Tue, 10.03.15 11:34, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote: I think it would make more sense to return 0 when ply isn't running, and 1 if it is, no? Did this in

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 4/5] fsckd: check if plymouth is running before attempting connection

2015-03-10 Thread Didier Roche
From fd28f24d9eaa16737cbc8f33b8fe1a806dc291b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:05:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 4/5] fsckd: check if plymouth is running before attempting connection --- src/fsckd/fsckd.c | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 4/5] fsckd: check if plymouth is running before attempting connection

2015-03-10 Thread Didier Roche
Le 10/03/2015 11:44, Lennart Poettering a écrit : On Tue, 10.03.15 11:34, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote: I think it would make more sense to return 0 when ply isn't running, and 1 if it is, no? Did this in the attached patch. Due to this, I needed then to return 1 even if we did

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 4/5] fsckd: check if plymouth is running before attempting connection

2015-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 10.03.15 11:34, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote: I think it would make more sense to return 0 when ply isn't running, and 1 if it is, no? From fd28f24d9eaa16737cbc8f33b8fe1a806dc291b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Didier Roche didro...@ubuntu.com Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015