[systemd-devel] [PATCH 5/6] mount /run without noexec

2011-05-31 Thread harald
From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com --- src/mount-setup.c |2 +- src/nspawn.c |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mount-setup.c b/src/mount-setup.c index 48c32ea..27c0edd 100644 ---

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 5/6] mount /run without noexec

2011-05-31 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hello Herald, Op 31-05-11 17:06, har...@redhat.com schreef: From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com Why do you need exec on /run ? ~Maarten ___ systemd-devel mailing list

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 5/6] mount /run without noexec

2011-05-31 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 02:29, Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com wrote: Why do you need exec on /run ? /run/initramfs/ is the full initramfs that brought the box up, not deleted after mounting and chroot()ing into the rootfs. We exec() into /run/initramfs, leave the rootfs behind us, and

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 5/6] mount /run without noexec

2011-05-31 Thread Harald Hoyer
Am 01.06.2011 um 02:29 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com: Hello Herald, Op 31-05-11 17:06, har...@redhat.com schreef: From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com Why do you need exec on /run ? ~Maarten Or, I would remount it

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 5/6] mount /run without noexec

2011-05-31 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 05:46, Harald Hoyer harald.ho...@gmail.com wrote: Am 01.06.2011 um 02:29 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com: Op 31-05-11 17:06, har...@redhat.com schreef: From: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com Why do you need