On Mon, 03.11.14 17:27, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:16:16PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 19.09.14 17:14, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
snip
I do see the usecase though for those projects. I'd probably suggest
not
On Wed, 05.11.14 12:27, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote:
it doesn't seem to be correct solution either. systemd will happily remove
cgroup
in which there are processes.
Oh. right, systemd is stricter there than I remembered: we will
actually migrate the PIDs before
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 09:16:16PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 19.09.14 17:14, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
snip
I do see the usecase though for those projects. I'd probably suggest
not to merge it for RHEL either. But instead I'd propose a different
solution
On Fri, 19.09.14 17:14, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
In cases when there is a cgroup tree in a controller hierarchy which was
not created by us, but it looks like it was (i.e. cgroup path is the
same as the one in systemd's named hierarchy) we shouldn't delete
it.
So,
In cases when there is a cgroup tree in a controller hierarchy which was
not created by us, but it looks like it was (i.e. cgroup path is the
same as the one in systemd's named hierarchy) we shouldn't delete it.
---
Reproducer:
1) start qemu-kvm VM via virsh/virt-manager
2) ls
