On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
> Hey William,
>
> On 06/21/2011 06:50 AM, William Douglas wrote:
>> Lennart Poettering writes:
>>
>>> In general I must say that I actually like the code (and the coding
>>> style) very much, so it's hard for me to say no to this.
>>>
>>>
Hey William,
On 06/21/2011 06:50 AM, William Douglas wrote:
> Lennart Poettering writes:
>
>> In general I must say that I actually like the code (and the coding
>> style) very much, so it's hard for me to say no to this.
>>
>> KUTGW,
>>
>> Lennart
> I understand your reasoning and, though I'm di
Lennart Poettering writes:
> In general I must say that I actually like the code (and the coding
> style) very much, so it's hard for me to say no to this.
>
> KUTGW,
>
> Lennart
I understand your reasoning and, though I'm disappointed it doesn't look like
this syslogd can make it into systemd,
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 17.06.11 14:53, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> William Douglas (william.r.doug...@gmail.com) said:
>> > For minimal distributions it is useful for systemd to have a
>> > syslogd as this avoids the need for e
On Thu, 16.06.11 22:35, William Douglas (william.r.doug...@gmail.com) wrote:
(Read my reply to Bill's mail first)
> - units/syslog-bridge.target
> + units/syslog-bridge.target \
We probably indeed should rename the two logging related services in
systemd. Right now "systemd-logger" conne
On Fri, 17.06.11 14:53, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> William Douglas (william.r.doug...@gmail.com) said:
> > For minimal distributions it is useful for systemd to have a
> > syslogd as this avoids the need for extra packages
> > (cron, rsyslog, syslog-ng, logrotate).
>
> My c
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> William Douglas (william.r.doug...@gmail.com) said:
>> For minimal distributions it is useful for systemd to have a
>> syslogd as this avoids the need for extra packages
>> (cron, rsyslog, syslog-ng, logrotate).
>
> My concern here is that
William Douglas (william.r.doug...@gmail.com) said:
> For minimal distributions it is useful for systemd to have a
> syslogd as this avoids the need for extra packages
> (cron, rsyslog, syslog-ng, logrotate).
My concern here is that this is the sort of thing that seems pretty
clearly out of the g
