On 04/01/2016 05:04 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 24.03.16 09:52, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote:

I have a "disconnected" Open vSwitch on my system named ovs1.  By
"disconnected" I mean that it is not connected to any physical
interface, bond, etc.; it exists only for inter-VM communication.

I just discovered that jumbo frames (anything larger than 1528 bytes)
are being dropped when traveling across the bridge.  I need to set the
MTU of the bridge (actually its internal port) to a larger value.

I haven't been able to figure out a way to get systemd-networkd to do
this.  I tried creating /etc/systemd/network/ovs1.link, but it had no
effect:

   [Match]
   OriginalName=ovs1

   [Link]
   MTUBytes=9000

Does "networkctl status" on the interface show that the .link file got
applied?

I figured it out.  99-default.link is lexically earlier than ovs1.link,
so my link file was never used.  Changing the name to 98-ovs1.link makes
it work.

I'm a bit embarrassed by this.  OTOH, I don't consider myself to be
overly stupid, and this is probably the 3rd or 4th time that I've been
bitten by this.  (About once a year or so, just long enough for me to
forget.)

Using ${INTERFACE}.link as the name of a link file is a very natural
thing to do, and the current setup ensures that this will never work.

Has changing 99-default.link to something like ZZZZ-default.link ever
been considered?

--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher                                         arequip...@gmail.com
-------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" --------
========================================================================

_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to