On Mon, 13.01.14 22:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
Eeeh, why? This new name suggests that this libary is for systemd
functionality. But so far it is a generic. Also, we have
libsystemd-daemon, libsystemd-id128, etc. As a consumer of the library,
I'd much prefer to
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:41:48PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 13.01.14 22:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
Eeeh, why? This new name suggests that this libary is for systemd
functionality. But so far it is a generic. Also, we have
libsystemd-daemon,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
So I am pretty sure libsystemd-id128, libsystemd-login,
libsystemd-journal should just end up in a single libsystemd.so together
with the event loop, the bus, the asyncns
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
So I am pretty sure libsystemd-id128, libsystemd-login,
libsystemd-journal should just end up in a single libsystemd.so together
with the event loop, the bus, the asyncns stuff and more. All this
functinality requires each other, and should
On Thu, 16.01.14 17:31, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
So I am pretty sure libsystemd-id128, libsystemd-login,
libsystemd-journal should just end up in a single libsystemd.so together
with the event loop, the bus, the asyncns
On Thu, 16.01.14 17:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
There are some exceptions to this though. For example, I am unsure about
libsystemd-daemon: it's relatively easy to maintain this in its own lib,
sicne so far it actually doesn't use any of the shared code,
On 16/01/14 15:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
There are some exceptions to this though. For example, I am unsure about
libsystemd-daemon: it's relatively easy to maintain this in its own lib,
sicne so far it actually doesn't use any of the shared code, because
its' embeddable. But then agaiun,
On Thu, 16.01.14 18:27, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Thu, 16.01.14 17:33, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014/1/16 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
I am also a bit worried about so-bumps:
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Thu, 16.01.14 17:33, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014/1/16 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
I am also a bit worried about so-bumps: currently we have very nice
backwards
compatibility, without any API
On Thu, 16.01.14 17:19, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
On 16/01/14 15:41, Lennart Poettering wrote:
There are some exceptions to this though. For example, I am unsure about
libsystemd-daemon: it's relatively easy to maintain this in its own lib,
sicne so far it
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Thu, 16.01.14 18:27, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
On Thu, 16.01.14 17:33, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
2014/1/16 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Well, it can certainly continue to use and build against the old version
for a while, no?
We'd have to make pre-systemd-209 and systemd-209 packages
co-installable
2014/1/16 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Well, it can certainly continue to use and build against the old version
for a while, no?
We'd have to make pre-systemd-209 and
'Twas brillig, and Michael Biebl at 16/01/14 18:22 did gyre and gimble:
2014/1/16 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Michael Biebl mbi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Well, it can certainly continue to use and build against the
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
commit c813ca40c859ff8abc8bc6aabc3f1e896623eb67
Author: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no
Date: Mon Jan 13 19:12:16 2014 +0100
libsystemd-dhcp: merge into libsystemd
OK.
Hmm, maybe DHCP should stay as a
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:10:20PM -0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
commit 5681d7fb8be37771c152d21ea6e95597d664e3f1
Author: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no
Date: Mon Jan 13 21:03:28 2014 +0100
libsystemd-dns: merge into libsystemd
Also rename sd-dns - sd-resolv.
Looks good.
commit
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
libsystemd-bus: rename to libsystemd
Documentation was updated to refer to either 'libsystemd' or 'sd-bus' in
place
of libsystemd-bus.
Eeeh, why? This new name suggests that this libary is for systemd
functionality.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:10:20PM -0800, Tom Gundersen wrote:
commit 5681d7fb8be37771c152d21ea6e95597d664e3f1
Author: Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no
Date: Mon Jan 13 21:03:28 2014 +0100
libsystemd-dns:
18 matches
Mail list logo
