08.07.2016 22:01, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> On Fri, 01.07.16 06:37, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> In principle, I do not see why we cannot have WantedBy and RequiredBy as
>> first class directives under [Unit] to spare all these hoops.
>
> systemd loads unit files as they
On Mon, 27.06.16 08:25, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
> Dear systemd folks,
>
>
> having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
> starting several services from it, is there a way, to let another
> service unit require all services started from that
01.07.2016 00:50, Paul Menzel пишет:
> Dear Michael, dear Andrei,
>
>
> Thank you for replying.
>
>
> Am Montag, den 27.06.2016, 15:37 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> 2016-06-27 13:49 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
>>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
>
Dear Michael, dear Andrei,
Thank you for replying.
Am Montag, den 27.06.2016, 15:37 +0200 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> 2016-06-27 13:49 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > > having a template for a service unit like
2016-06-27 13:49 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Menzel
> wrote:
>> Dear systemd folks,
>>
>>
>> having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
>> starting several services from it, is
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> Dear systemd folks,
>
>
> having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
> starting several services from it, is there a way, to let another
> service unit require all services started from
Dear systemd folks,
having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
starting several services from it, is there a way, to let another
service unit require all services started from that template?
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message