On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:19:51PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Just a heads-up: while reading the "Unwants" thread I noticed that
> dependencies are the only types of lists in unit files that can't be
> reset, so my example in there actually doesn't work, so please don't
> commit my patch just
Just a heads-up: while reading the "Unwants" thread I noticed that
dependencies are the only types of lists in unit files that can't be
reset, so my example in there actually doesn't work, so please don't
commit my patch just now. I'm writing more examples and will resubmit
anyway.
Christian
Am 24.01.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 02:13:00PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> +
>> +Making a unit enableable
>> +
>> +The following snippet makes a unit
>> +(
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 02:13:00PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Am 23.01.2015 um 15:20 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> > I think it would be great to have an Examples section in
> > systemd.{unit, service,socket,path,...} giving a semi-realistic
> > example of a unit that can serve as
Am 23.01.2015 um 15:20 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> I think it would be great to have an Examples section in
> systemd.{unit, service,socket,path,...} giving a semi-realistic
> example of a unit that can serve as a template. For systemd.socket
> there should be two: an Accept=yes and A
