On Tue, 08.07.14 23:07, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Now let's start the dialog with machine roles and start by agreeing
> what roles are
What's the latest on this?
I'd be willing to take a patch for this, but he same rules as for
deployment should apply: no strict checks
]] Lennart Poettering
> On Wed, 09.07.14 12:58, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
>
> > ]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> >
> > > On 07/09/2014 08:33 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > > ]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> > > >
> > > >> If we manage to do that, introduce "rolefulfilment=" in units whi
On 07/09/2014 10:58 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
On 07/09/2014 08:33 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
If we manage to do that, introduce "rolefulfilment=" in units which we
would define those standardized predefined set of roles as in for
httpd.
On Wed, 09.07.14 12:58, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
> ]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>
> > On 07/09/2014 08:33 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > ]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> > >
> > >> If we manage to do that, introduce "rolefulfilment=" in units which we
> > >> would define those standard
]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> On 07/09/2014 08:33 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> >
> >> If we manage to do that, introduce "rolefulfilment=" in units which we
> >> would define those standardized predefined set of roles as in for
> >> httpd.service we might have rolefu
On 07/09/2014 08:33 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
If we manage to do that, introduce "rolefulfilment=" in units which we
would define those standardized predefined set of roles as in for
httpd.service we might have rolefulfilment=web server, for postgresql,
rolefulfilme
]] "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> If we manage to do that, introduce "rolefulfilment=" in units which we
> would define those standardized predefined set of roles as in for
> httpd.service we might have rolefulfilment=web server, for postgresql,
> rolefulfilment=database server etc. so you could list
On 07/09/2014 12:14 AM, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
I don't see much value in choosing a role from a predefined list.
Rarely do machines fit into one single, straightforward role.
I would disagree here like for one example security wise you want to
implement only one primary role per server
I don't see much value in choosing a role from a predefined list.
Rarely do machines fit into one single, straightforward role.
It would be more useful to support machine tags/labels/roles that map
to units, especially if that's dynamically configurable using, say,
DHCP(v6). Then, something may be
Now let's start the dialog with machine roles and start by agreeing what
roles are
From my point of view roles are human representation of the primary
duty the machine performs it's not the environment they are run in.
( like development,staging,production ) nor is it the components
themselves
10 matches
Mail list logo
