On Wed, 09.04.14 09:40, Samuli Suominen (ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote:
> >> This is the *only* patch we are carrying for udev currently, otherwise
> >> uClibc builds work fine, so please at least consider what
> >> I just said.
> >
> > All this "locale_t" thing is standarized in POSIX 2008, . it is
On 08/04/14 19:16, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> El 08/04/14 03:04, Samuli Suominen escribió:
>
>> This is the *only* patch we are carrying for udev currently, otherwise
>> uClibc builds work fine, so please at least consider what
>> I just said.
>
> All this "locale_t" thing is standarized in POSIX
El 08/04/14 03:04, Samuli Suominen escribió:
This is the *only* patch we are carrying for udev currently, otherwise
uClibc builds work fine, so please at least consider what
I just said.
All this "locale_t" thing is standarized in POSIX 2008, . it is up to
the particular libc to keep up with
On 08/04/14 15:25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 09:04:37AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> File src/shared/util.h is using locale_t which isn't used by the
>> strictly udev parts of the systemd code, I propose to move
>> this to a different header, so it is only us
On 08/04/14 18:52, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.04.14 09:04, Samuli Suominen (ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote:
>
> I am sorry, but we are not interested in carrying compat code for exotic
> libc's. We have made this clear in the past. The onus is on those libc's
> to be compatible with glibc
On Tue, 08.04.14 09:04, Samuli Suominen (ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote:
I am sorry, but we are not interested in carrying compat code for exotic
libc's. We have made this clear in the past. The onus is on those libc's
to be compatible with glibc and POSIX and all these things, and systemd
is not the
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 09:04:37AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> File src/shared/util.h is using locale_t which isn't used by the
> strictly udev parts of the systemd code, I propose to move
> this to a different header, so it is only used where it's actually required.
I see the usefulness of dis
I can work on a patch that creates the new header, if this is something
you'd be willing to consider.
On 08/04/14 09:04, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> First, some history, we have within Gentoo been pushing changes to
> uClibc head for functions that are used
> by the udev code of systemd, that were pr
First, some history, we have within Gentoo been pushing changes to
uClibc head for functions that are used
by the udev code of systemd, that were prior to that, only in glibc.
I assume this is the way you want to see things integrated, to not carry
uClibc specific hacks in systemd's code.
However,