On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 20:58:02 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> Huh?
Argh! .. and finally, thanks a lot for your exmaple. I iterated into the
sitation that this is not about .include.
Probably due to some false premise or testing result, I lived in false
feeling that the .include is _the tr
В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:46:21 +0200
Pavel Raiskup пишет:
> On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 20:44:38 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:29:35 +0200
> > Pavel Raiskup пишет:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 20:06:50 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > > > В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:4
On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 20:44:38 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:29:35 +0200
> Pavel Raiskup пишет:
>
> > On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 20:06:50 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > > В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:40:11 +0200
> > > Pavel Raiskup пишет:
> > >
> > > > On Wednesday 17
В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:29:35 +0200
Pavel Raiskup пишет:
> On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 20:06:50 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:40:11 +0200
> > Pavel Raiskup пишет:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 11:50:08 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > > On We
On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 20:06:50 Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:40:11 +0200
> Pavel Raiskup пишет:
>
> > On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 11:50:08 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 08:52:00AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > Thank
В Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:40:11 +0200
Pavel Raiskup пишет:
> On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 11:50:08 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 08:52:00AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > Thanks, I agree, and yet another rule on top of that -- the /usr/lib
> > > dropins _are i
On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 11:50:08 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 08:52:00AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Thanks, I agree, and yet another rule on top of that -- the /usr/lib
> > dropins _are ignored_ if /etc service overriding the one in /usr/lib
> > exists
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 08:52:00AM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 01:33:02 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:07:06PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > > for example
> > > > tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf and tmpfiles.d/systemd-nologin.conf a
On Wednesday 17 of September 2014 01:33:02 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:07:06PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > for example
> > > tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf and tmpfiles.d/systemd-nologin.conf are split
> > > exactly for the purpose of making it easier to override
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 05:07:06PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > for example
> > tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf and tmpfiles.d/systemd-nologin.conf are split
> > exactly for the purpose of making it easier to override separately. The
> > case of unit files is slightly different, but we really want to ha
On Tuesday 16 of September 2014 16:42:32 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 01:16 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > This would change the way that drop-ins work. Your model is not
> > necessarily worse, but dropins have been the advertised way to do
> > overiddes for a while, and
On 09/16/2014 01:16 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:21:30PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Hi,
consider the situation that admin has /etc/systemd/system/a.service, which
includes via .include the /usr/lib/systemd/system/a.service. Then in our
case there exists a
On Tuesday 16 of September 2014 16:41:49 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 04:35:50PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > This should not be a revert. Just make it properly defined?
>
> It was already properly defined, maybe just not explicitly documented
> for this case. A
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 04:35:50PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> This is reply to both Tomasz and Zbigniew, thanks for reactions!
>
> On Tuesday 16 of September 2014 16:14:16 Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 03:16:12PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 16,
This is reply to both Tomasz and Zbigniew, thanks for reactions!
On Tuesday 16 of September 2014 16:14:16 Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 03:16:12PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:21:30PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > I would expect that
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 03:16:12PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:21:30PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > consider the situation that admin has /etc/systemd/system/a.service, which
> > includes via .include the /usr/lib/systemd/system/a.service.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:21:30PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> consider the situation that admin has /etc/systemd/system/a.service, which
> includes via .include the /usr/lib/systemd/system/a.service. Then in our
> case there exists also packaged /usr/lib/systemd/system/a.service.d/ wit
Hi,
consider the situation that admin has /etc/systemd/system/a.service, which
includes via .include the /usr/lib/systemd/system/a.service. Then in our
case there exists also packaged /usr/lib/systemd/system/a.service.d/ with
existing drop-in. In this case - the setup from /etc/ is beaten by
dro
18 matches
Mail list logo