On Sun, 02.03.14 19:48, David Farning (dfarn...@gmail.com) wrote:
Over the last couple of weeks I have been looking over and testing the
systemd. Thanks for all the hard work and interesting ideas.
One issue that has come to mind is the quality and structure of the
documentation. The
Over the last couple of weeks I have been looking over and testing the
systemd. Thanks for all the hard work and interesting ideas.
One issue that has come to mind is the quality and structure of the
documentation. The quality and clarity of the documentation can be as
important as the quality
On 03/03/14 03:48, David Farning wrote:
Over the last couple of weeks I have been looking over and testing the
systemd. Thanks for all the hard work and interesting ideas.
One issue that has come to mind is the quality and structure of the
documentation. The quality and clarity of the
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 07:48:26PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
I would would be happy to work on upstream wiki site to help with
communication But I want to be careful not to overstep.
Hi,
quite a few people work on the documentation, but there still are
extensive gaps. The TODO list
I am approaching the situation from a slightly different perspective.
The recent acceptance of systemd as the default init system in Debian
and the statement by Canonical that Ubuntu will default to systemd,
possibly as soon as 14.10, means that there will be an influx of new
developers and
