On Do, 10.12.20 10:58, Arian Van Putten (ar...@wire.com) wrote:
> I think it's an excellent idea.
>
> Question: Currently systemd-importd still has an indirect dependency on
> libgcrypt through it depending on the gnupg binary for signatures.
> Would it maybe be an idea to add support for other
I think it's an excellent idea.
Question: Currently systemd-importd still has an indirect dependency on
libgcrypt through it depending on the gnupg binary for signatures.
Would it maybe be an idea to add support for other signature schemes to
importd that can be directly implemented with
Hi. Really good initiative!
Also wanted to inform about connectedhomeip project which has an
abstraction layer for OpenSSL and Mbed TLS. Probably the layer is far from
being ready for systemd to use though.
Umut
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:51 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Heya!
>
> Currently,
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 10:50 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya!
>
> Currently, some parts of the systemd tree link against OpenSSL, others
> link against gnutls and libgcrypt, and even others support either,
> controlled by a compile time switch.
>
> This is of course less than ideal, since
Heya!
Currently, some parts of the systemd tree link against OpenSSL, others
link against gnutls and libgcrypt, and even others support either,
controlled by a compile time switch.
This is of course less than ideal, since it means we need to maintain
needlessly complex, redundant code to support
