Hi,
Find my comments below please.
On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:51 AM, David Timothy Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
Can someone explain the process level management?
Right now, it's possible to do
On Fri, 29.11.13 09:33, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
Hi,
Find my comments below please.
On Nov 29, 2013, at 9:51 AM, David Timothy Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
On Nov 25, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
Can someone explain the process level management?
Right now, it's possible to do directly in the cgroups file system,
but we're eventually moving away from anything manipulating that but
systemd. I think that
Hi,
On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
abstraction?
How do we do it in the process level then. Lets say a
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
On Nov 24, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
How do we support thread level resource management with the
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
Any plans to support existing applications that are making use of thread
level resource management? If not, what are we left with then, posix thread
priorities?
Kay is right; there is no direct replacement.
Hi,
How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
abstraction?
Can we use scopes with task ids of threads? If so, what is the API to put the
task id into its own scope unit?
Thanks.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
umut.tezdu...@axis.com wrote:
How do we support thread level resource management with the new cgroup
abstraction?
Can we use scopes with task ids of threads? If so, what is the API to put the
task id into its own scope unit?
There is
