Re: [systemd-devel] User bus broke automatic multiseat
There is a discussion with gdm developers at https://bugzilla.gnome.org /show_bug.cgi?id=776203 , but they are not yet ready to implement this solution. В Пн, 16/01/2017 в 13:56 +, Simon McVittie пишет: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 at 23:23:55 +0300, Oleg Samarin wrote: > > The following change in systemd-226: > > > > systemd now supports the concept of user buses replacing > > session buses, if used with dbus-1.10 (and enabled via dbus > > --enable-user-session). It previously only supported this on > > kdbus-enabled systems, and this release expands this to > > 'dbus-daemon' systems > > > > totally broke the automatic multiseat with GDM: https://bugzilla.re > > dhat > > .com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404849 > > > > What configuration options can restore the the old session-bus > > behavior? > > Either don't configure dbus with --enable-user-session, or teach gdm > to create a per-display D-Bus bus for each of its X11 displays (or > Wayland equivalent). > > For the former solution, see the split between the dbus and > dbus-user-session packages in Debian. dbus is always configured > with --enable-user-session there, but we split out the user-session > parts > (basically /usr/lib/systemd/user) into dbus-user-session_*.deb so > that > it's opt-in. > > For the latter solution, the patch/script on the Red Hat bug you > referenced > are implementations of the right sort of idea. Please talk to the gdm > (GNOME) > developers about the best way to integrate that. > > S > ___ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] User bus broke automatic multiseat
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 at 23:23:55 +0300, Oleg Samarin wrote: > The following change in systemd-226: > > systemd now supports the concept of user buses replacing > session buses, if used with dbus-1.10 (and enabled via dbus > --enable-user-session). It previously only supported this on > kdbus-enabled systems, and this release expands this to > 'dbus-daemon' systems > > totally broke the automatic multiseat with GDM: https://bugzilla.redhat > .com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404849 > > What configuration options can restore the the old session-bus > behavior? Either don't configure dbus with --enable-user-session, or teach gdm to create a per-display D-Bus bus for each of its X11 displays (or Wayland equivalent). For the former solution, see the split between the dbus and dbus-user-session packages in Debian. dbus is always configured with --enable-user-session there, but we split out the user-session parts (basically /usr/lib/systemd/user) into dbus-user-session_*.deb so that it's opt-in. For the latter solution, the patch/script on the Red Hat bug you referenced are implementations of the right sort of idea. Please talk to the gdm (GNOME) developers about the best way to integrate that. S ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
[systemd-devel] User bus broke automatic multiseat
The following change in systemd-226: systemd now supports the concept of user buses replacing session buses, if used with dbus-1.10 (and enabled via dbus --enable-user-session). It previously only supported this on kdbus-enabled systems, and this release expands this to 'dbus-daemon' systems totally broke the automatic multiseat with GDM: https://bugzilla.redhat .com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404849 What configuration options can restore the the old session-bus behavior? ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
