Re: [systemd-devel] Verbose output option when starting daemons manually

2012-11-20 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 08.11.12 18:23, William Giokas (1007...@gmail.com) wrote: > All, Heya, > I have been using systemd for a few months now, and I must say, it is a > great init system. I myself am no coder, else I would attempt to write > something to do just this. One not-dealbreaking thing that I do find

Re: [systemd-devel] Verbose output option when starting daemons manually

2012-11-08 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 12:45:22AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > What's lacking is the status to be shown when units are manually > started/reloaded/restart/stopped there is just one slight problem > implementing that which is you dont want that output when the > service is started at boo

[systemd-devel] Verbose output option when starting daemons manually

2012-11-08 Thread William Giokas
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 12:45:22AM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > Not the first and probably not the last that expected that behavior > and proposed this. > > What's lacking is the status to be shown when units are manually > started/reloaded/restart/stopped there is just one slight probl

Re: [systemd-devel] Verbose output option when starting daemons manually

2012-11-08 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/09/2012 12:23 AM, William Giokas wrote: All, I have been using systemd for a few months now, and I must say, it is a great init system. I myself am no coder, else I would attempt to write something to do just this. One not-dealbreaking thing that I do find lacking is a verbose option for `

[systemd-devel] Verbose output option when starting daemons manually

2012-11-08 Thread William Giokas
All, I have been using systemd for a few months now, and I must say, it is a great init system. I myself am no coder, else I would attempt to write something to do just this. One not-dealbreaking thing that I do find lacking is a verbose option for `systemctl start `, essentially running `journalc