On Do, 07.03.19 18:48, Tomasz Torcz (to...@pipebreaker.pl) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:24:08AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > 2. rtags (it uses default.target in a socket file, which is even
> >weirder, should use sockets.target)
>
> sockets.target is rather odd for me. If I
On Do, 07.03.19 16:46, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > > It might make sense to extend "systemd-analyze" in some form to warn
> > > > about this, maybe file an RFE bug about that?
> > >
> > > I was considering filing a lintian bug, which would check debian
> > > packages
Tomasz,
sockets.target is rather odd for me. If I had (hypothetical)
socket-activable service, which is only relevant in GUI environment,
I would like its socket to be pulled in by graphical.target. Using
sockets.target would let my hypothetical service to be available in
text-only boot.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 06:55:21PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 07.03.19 um 18:48 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:24:08AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> 2. rtags (it uses default.target in a socket file, which is even
> >>weirder, should use
Am 07.03.19 um 18:48 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:24:08AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> 2. rtags (it uses default.target in a socket file, which is even
>>weirder, should use sockets.target)
>
> sockets.target is rather odd for me. If I had (hypothetical)
>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:24:08AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> 2. rtags (it uses default.target in a socket file, which is even
>weirder, should use sockets.target)
sockets.target is rather odd for me. If I had (hypothetical)
socket-activable service, which is only relevant in GUI
Am Do., 7. März 2019 um 15:47 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:31:18AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am Do., 7. März 2019 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Lennart Poettering
> > :
> > >
> > > On Do, 07.03.19 10:30, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:31:18AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am Do., 7. März 2019 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Lennart Poettering
> :
> >
> > On Do, 07.03.19 10:30, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like quite a few services use
> > > WantedBy=default.target
> > >
Am Do., 7. März 2019 um 11:24 Uhr schrieb Lennart Poettering
:
>
> On Do, 07.03.19 10:30, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Looks like quite a few services use
> > WantedBy=default.target
> > https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=WantedBy%3Ddefault.target
> >
> > Some of them are user
On Do, 07.03.19 10:30, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Looks like quite a few services use
> WantedBy=default.target
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=WantedBy%3Ddefault.target
>
> Some of them are user services, but I wonder if there is
> recommendation regarding system
Looks like quite a few services use
WantedBy=default.target
https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=WantedBy%3Ddefault.target
Some of them are user services, but I wonder if there is
recommendation regarding system services.
Should they use multi-user.target or graphical.target instead or is it
ok
11 matches
Mail list logo
