Re: [systemd-devel] automount unit that never fails?

On Fri, 04.11.16 09:38, Bjørn Forsman (bjorn.fors...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > On 3 November 2016 at 20:19, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > Your mail does not say in any way what precisely your issue is? > > Did you read the first post? I hope not, because I

Re: [systemd-devel] automount unit that never fails?

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Bjørn Forsman wrote: Hi systemd developers, My name is Bjørn Forsman and this is my first post to this list. I have a question/issue with the behaviour of (auto)mount units. When a mount unit fails (repeatedly), it takes the corresponding automount unit down with it. To me

Re: [systemd-devel] automount unit that never fails?

Hi Lennart, On 3 November 2016 at 20:19, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Your mail does not say in any way what precisely your issue is? Did you read the first post? I hope not, because I don't really know how to describe it more precisely than that :-) Below is a copy of

Re: [systemd-devel] automount unit that never fails?

On Sat, 29.10.16 14:20, Bjørn Forsman (bjorn.fors...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 1 October 2016 at 17:14, Bjørn Forsman wrote: > > On 20 September 2016 at 09:08, Bjørn Forsman > > wrote: > >> I have a question/issue with the behaviour of (auto)mount

Re: [systemd-devel] automount unit that never fails?

On 1 October 2016 at 17:14, Bjørn Forsman wrote: > On 20 September 2016 at 09:08, Bjørn Forsman wrote: >> I have a question/issue with the behaviour of (auto)mount units. >> [...] > > Bump. Bump again. Anyone? If systemd + automount isn't the

[systemd-devel] automount unit that never fails?

Hi systemd developers, My name is Bjørn Forsman and this is my first post to this list. I have a question/issue with the behaviour of (auto)mount units. When a mount unit fails (repeatedly), it takes the corresponding automount unit down with it. To me this breaks a very nice property I'd like