Re: [systemd-devel] fsckd needs to go -- possible compromise?

2015-04-08 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Lennart Poettering [2015-04-07 16:14 +0200]: >> Well, the asnc IO socket handling thing was not dealt with. The newest >> patches still use fgets(). >> [...] >> The killer issue really is the safety issue. We shouldn't include >> code in systemd

Re: [systemd-devel] fsckd needs to go -- possible compromise?

2015-04-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello all, Lennart Poettering [2015-04-07 16:14 +0200]: > Well, the asnc IO socket handling thing was not dealt with. The newest > patches still use fgets(). > [...] > The killer issue really is the safety issue. We shouldn't include > code in systemd that makes dangerous things like killing runni