W dniu 29.05.2017 o 11:37, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Sat, 27.05.17 20:51, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I came across the following:
>> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
>> call that normally would trigger restart actua
On Sat, 27.05.17 20:51, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I came across the following:
> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
> call that normally would trigger restart actually triggers sending
> sighup to the init of a namespace, and s
W dniu 28.05.2017 o 20:43, Mike Gilbert pisze:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Michał Zegan
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I came across the following:
>> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
>> call that normally would trigger restart actually triggers sending
>> si
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Michał Zegan
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I came across the following:
> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
> call that normally would trigger restart actually triggers sending
> sighup to the init of a namespace, and sigint is sent in case
Hello.
I came across the following:
The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
call that normally would trigger restart actually triggers sending
sighup to the init of a namespace, and sigint is sent in case of
halt/poweroff.
I have verified that reboot actually triggers
