On Tue, 19.05.15 20:13, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> В Tue, 19 May 2015 14:07:21 +0200
> Lennart Poettering пишет:
>
> > On Tue, 19.05.15 14:26, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Uoti Urpala
> > > wrote:
> > > > As for
В Tue, 19 May 2015 14:07:21 +0200
Lennart Poettering пишет:
> On Tue, 19.05.15 14:26, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Uoti Urpala
> > wrote:
> > > As for Evert's original problem, I think it's that RESTART is propagated
> > > to all Required
On Tue, 19.05.15 17:13, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 14:06 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 19.05.15 14:15, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> > > As for Evert's original problem, I think it's that RESTART is propagated
> > > to all R
On Tue, 19.05.15 14:15, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 01:26 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 19.05.15 00:55, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14.05.15 21:23, Evert (evert.gen...@planet.nl) wrote:
> > > > According t
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 19.05.15 13:08, Alban Crequy (al...@endocode.com) wrote:
>
>> The commit be7d9ff730cb88d7c6a869dd5c47754c78ceaef2 ("core: introduce
>> seperate reverse dependencies for Requires= and Requisite=")
>> introduced a regression in rkt
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 14:06 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 19.05.15 14:15, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> > As for Evert's original problem, I think it's that RESTART is propagated
> > to all RequiredBy units unconditionally - even if those are currently
> > stopped! Thi
On Tue, 19.05.15 13:08, Alban Crequy (al...@endocode.com) wrote:
> The commit be7d9ff730cb88d7c6a869dd5c47754c78ceaef2 ("core: introduce
> seperate reverse dependencies for Requires= and Requisite=")
> introduced a regression in rkt: the container does not stop anymore
> when the main service term
On Tue, 19.05.15 14:26, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > As for Evert's original problem, I think it's that RESTART is propagated
> > to all RequiredBy units unconditionally - even if those are currently
> > stopped! This affe
On Tue, 19.05.15 14:15, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 01:26 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 19.05.15 00:55, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14.05.15 21:23, Evert (evert.gen...@planet.nl) wrote:
> > > > According t
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> As for Evert's original problem, I think it's that RESTART is propagated
> to all RequiredBy units unconditionally - even if those are currently
> stopped! This affects both Requires= and Requisite= in exactly the same
> way.
Exactly. At least
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 01:26 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 19.05.15 00:55, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> > On Thu, 14.05.15 21:23, Evert (evert.gen...@planet.nl) wrote:
> > > According to the systemd documentation, Requisite disallows starting a
> > > unit unless
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 19.05.15 00:55, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 14.05.15 21:23, Evert (evert.gen...@planet.nl) wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > According to the systemd documentation, Requisite disallows starting a
>>
On Tue, 19.05.15 00:55, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> On Thu, 14.05.15 21:23, Evert (evert.gen...@planet.nl) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > According to the systemd documentation, Requisite disallows starting a
> > unit unless the specified unit has been started. This seems to w
On Thu, 14.05.15 21:23, Evert (evert.gen...@planet.nl) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to the systemd documentation, Requisite disallows starting a
> unit unless the specified unit has been started. This seems to work
> fine, however, if the specified unit has been restarted, this unit will
> be start
On 15-05-15 07:05, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Thu, 14 May 2015 21:23:38 +0200
> Evert пишет:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> According to the systemd documentation, Requisite disallows starting a
>> unit unless the specified unit has been started. This seems to work
>> fine, however, if the specified unit has been
В Thu, 14 May 2015 21:23:38 +0200
Evert пишет:
> Hi,
>
> According to the systemd documentation, Requisite disallows starting a
> unit unless the specified unit has been started. This seems to work
> fine, however, if the specified unit has been restarted, this unit will
> be started too!
> This
Hi,
According to the systemd documentation, Requisite disallows starting a
unit unless the specified unit has been started. This seems to work
fine, however, if the specified unit has been restarted, this unit will
be started too!
This is not what should happen and it doesn't happen with a stop an
17 matches
Mail list logo
