On Sun, 10.01.16 17:15, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I remember this discussed before, I think one suggestion was to split into
> two targets, and only hold the login until the first target. Nobody
> implemented it though.
Yes, that is indeed the plan, user@.service should only
On Sun, 10.01.16 22:25, Tom Yan (tom.t...@gmail.com) wrote:
> So I am recently experiencing some issue with pulseaudio (which I
> already filed a bug report:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93651) that it takes a
> long time to start.
>
> The thing is, I am thinking whether it
That's exactly what I meant. There should be a target for units that
"need to be waited" and "no need to be waited" respectively. One can
argue which one should a sound service fall into with whatever point,
but that's out of the scope of the issue I am talking about here.
I just thought systemd
Ugh I am not talking about system units, but user units...
P.S. Although not really relevant here, but I am using the (user)
service file provided by upstream pulseaudio
On 11 January 2016 at 01:30, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.01.2016 um 18:15 schrieb Mantas
Am 10.01.2016 um 18:42 schrieb Tom Yan:
Ugh I am not talking about system units, but user units...
P.S. Although not really relevant here, but I am using the (user)
service file provided by upstream pulseaudio
well, and i am talking about solutions and working setups
and yes i know that
Am 10.01.2016 um 18:15 schrieb Mantas Mikulėnas:
I remember this discussed before, I think one suggestion was to split
into two targets, and only hold the login until the first target. Nobody
implemented it though.
But yes, pulseaudio.socket would be a requirement of that. If you don't
want
The only thing seems to be you cannot go low latency with system mode
pulseaudio
W dniu 10.01.2016 o 18:53, Reindl Harald pisze:
Am 10.01.2016 um 18:42 schrieb Tom Yan:
Ugh I am not talking about system units, but user units...
P.S. Although not really relevant here, but I am using the
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 07:08:51PM +0100, Michał Zegan wrote:
>
> W dniu 10.01.2016 o 18:53, Reindl Harald pisze:
> >
> > Am 10.01.2016 um 18:42 schrieb Tom Yan:
> > > Ugh I am not talking about system units, but user units...
> > >
> > > P.S. Although not really relevant here, but I am using the