On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:46 AM, kenneth topp to...@bllue.org wrote:
В Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:35:21 -0400
kenneth topp to...@bllue.org пишет:
Hi,
My system appears healthy, but for some reason systemd not in a good
state.
From the commands and their output, I have two concerns.
1) why is
On 03/31/2015 02:30 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/30/2015 10:32 PM, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Heyja
Should this not be dropped
On Mon, 30.03.15 21:15, Andrew Jones (drjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
QEMU/KVM guests do not have hypervisor nodes, but they do have
fw-cfg nodes (since qemu v2.3.0-rc0). fw-cfg nodes are documented,
see kernel doc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt,
and therefore we should be able
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:18:08AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 30.03.15 21:15, Andrew Jones (drjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
QEMU/KVM guests do not have hypervisor nodes, but they do have
fw-cfg nodes (since qemu v2.3.0-rc0). fw-cfg nodes are documented,
see kernel doc
---
src/shared/virt.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/virt.c b/src/shared/virt.c
index aa3501f42916c..712523210d720 100644
--- a/src/shared/virt.c
+++ b/src/shared/virt.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int detect_vm_cpuid(const char **_id) {
}
Kernel doc Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-ofw says that
the /proc/device-tree symlink should be used, as opposed to
directly accessing /sys/firmware/devicetree/base. The former is
ABI, but not the later.
---
src/shared/virt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
This series adds support for detecting if an arm or aarch64
deployment is a Xen or QEMU/KVM guest. I've tested the QEMU/KVM
detection on an AArch64 guest. The Xen detection has *not* been
tested, thus the RFT. Also note that testing was not done with
this exact series, but rather a backport to an
QEMU/KVM guests do not have hypervisor nodes, but they do have
fw-cfg nodes (since qemu v2.3.0-rc0). fw-cfg nodes are documented,
see kernel doc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fw-cfg.txt,
and therefore we should be able to rely on it in this detection.
Unfortunately, we currently don't
Hello,
We've got the Easter long weekend coming up here in the UK, and I intend to
spend it away from the computer. Is there anything I need to fix with this
patch to make it acceptable to you?
On Wednesday 25 March 2015 17:00:09 Simon Farnsworth wrote:
Just a couple of trivial oversights.
---
Try to keep syscalls as minimal as possible.
---
src/core/namespace.c | 2 +-
src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 16
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/namespace.c b/src/core/namespace.c
index f8a2bbc..718da23 100644
--- a/src/core/namespace.c
+++
Am Montag, den 30.03.2015, 20:35 + schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
It's not like this is receiving the love it needs, hence I'm pretty sure
nobody is using this.
Is there a replacement for systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent in any
desktop suite? I know at least one person using that peace of
From: Alban Crequy al...@endocode.com
Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it prevents systemd-nspawn
from creating the basic devices in /dev in the container.
This patch implements a workaround: when mknod fails,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's
intended purpose has been fulfilled already.
Agreed that it doesn't make sense to have
On 03/31/2015 01:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's
intended purpose has been
2015-03-31 16:20 GMT+02:00 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 03/31/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2015-03-31 15:47 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What I'm proposing is that we
Users might have hard time figuring out that they need to call systemctl
reset-failed, before they are allowed to start the service again, after service
ended up in failed state because start job rate limiting. Let's be nice and
print better error message.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:14:48PM +0200, Alban Crequy wrote:
From: Alban Crequy al...@endocode.com
Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it prevents systemd-nspawn
from creating the basic devices in /dev in the
Older version of systemd does not have d-bus method ListUnitsFiltered,
so systemctl -r will fail just with:
Failed to list units: Method ListUnitsFiltered with signature as on
interface org.freedesktop.systemd1.Manager doesn't exist
So lets skip such machines.
---
src/systemctl/systemctl.c | 6
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:32:35PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:51:26AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
[...]
* Current
On Tue, 31.03.15 16:51, Alban Crequy (alban.cre...@gmail.com) wrote:
-if (mknod(to, st.st_mode, st.st_rdev) 0)
-return log_error_errno(errno, mknod(%s)
failed: %m, to);
+if (mknod(to, st.st_mode, st.st_rdev) 0)
On 03/31/2015 02:58 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
When I made the final ConsoleKit release, I added a NEWS entry, saying
that this software was discontinued and pointing to the replacements.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ConsoleKit/commit/?id=af75e100dc4d4fac2e1633aa134e40e390d38918
We could do
On 03/31/2015 02:27 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
And from the looks of it the Red Hat desktop team maintainers in Gnome seem
to be expecting the Gnome users to be using Red Hat's own product cockpit to
take care of that.
sorry, but that's not a real replacement for systemadm. Don't want to
run a
2015-03-31 15:47 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
it's not being maintained, there exist better alternatives thus it's
intended
When I made the final ConsoleKit release, I added a NEWS entry, saying
that this software was discontinued and pointing to the replacements.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ConsoleKit/commit/?id=af75e100dc4d4fac2e1633aa134e40e390d38918
We could do something similar for systemd-ui. That said, I think
On Tue, 31.03.15 17:14, Alban Crequy (alban.cre...@gmail.com) wrote:
From: Alban Crequy al...@endocode.com
Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it prevents systemd-nspawn
from creating the basic devices in /dev
On 03/31/2015 02:30 PM, Michael Laß wrote:
Am Montag, den 30.03.2015, 20:35 + schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
It's not like this is receiving the love it needs, hence I'm pretty sure
nobody is using this.
Is there a replacement for systemd-gnome-ask-password-agent in any
desktop suite? I
On Tuesday 31 March 2015 13:53:38 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:46:40AM +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
Hello,
We've got the Easter long weekend coming up here in the UK, and I intend to
spend it away from the computer. Is there anything I need to fix with
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:14:48PM +0200, Alban Crequy wrote:
From: Alban Crequy al...@endocode.com
Some systems abusively restrict mknod, even when the device node already
exists in /dev. This is unfortunate because it
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:46:40AM +0100, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
Hello,
We've got the Easter long weekend coming up here in the UK, and I intend to
spend it away from the computer. Is there anything I need to fix with this
patch to make it acceptable to you?
No, the patch is fine afaik. If
On 31 March 2015 at 15:08, Shawn Landden shawnland...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/31/2015 02:30 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On 03/31/2015 02:09 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
2015-03-31 15:47 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:31:31AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What I'm proposing is that we dropped that proof of concept since
it's not being maintained, there
On Mon, 30.03.15 14:42, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
If you havei for example ext4 on iscsi devices it is possible to setup
qoutas there. Unfortunatelly because such fstab entry contains _netdev,
systemd will not add dependency to quotaon.service.
I think this really needs a
On Tue, 31.03.15 16:10, Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Older version of systemd does not have d-bus method ListUnitsFiltered,
so systemctl -r will fail just with:
I think I'd really prefer if we'd simply fall back to ListUnits() in
this case, and do the filtering client side only. In
On Mon, 30.03.15 19:30, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
What do you feel is missing from systemctl show?
It is only suppose to show fields that have been changed by humans
(even the developer) not systemd defaults.
Hmm?
It supresses empty fields by default, unless you
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 07:32:35PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:51:26AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015
On Tue, 31.03.15 17:10, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
Users might have hard time figuring out that they need to call systemctl
reset-failed, before they are allowed to start the service again, after
service
ended up in failed state because start job rate limiting. Let's be
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:14:26PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 31.03.15 11:35, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
+/* Some systems abusively restrict mknod
but
+ * allow bind mounts. */
+
On Mon, 30.03.15 15:32, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Heyja
Should this not be dropped and *DE write,integrate/implement an graphical
frontend to systemd for themselves?
It's not like
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov
dimitri.j.led...@intel.com wrote:
On 31 March 2015 at 15:08, Shawn Landden shawnland...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/31/2015 02:30 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
On
On Tue, 31.03.15 11:35, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote:
+/* Some systems abusively restrict mknod
but
+ * allow bind mounts. */
+r = touch(to);
+if
On Mon, 30.03.15 20:35, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heyja
Should this not be dropped and *DE write,integrate/implement an graphical
frontend to systemd for themselves?
It's not like this is receiving the love it needs, hence I'm pretty sure
nobody is using this.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 30.03.15 19:30, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
What do you feel is missing from systemctl show?
It is only suppose to show fields that have been changed by humans
(even the developer)
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/31/2015 02:30 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/30/2015 10:32 PM, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:35
On Tue, 31.03.15 11:50, Iago López Galeiras (i...@endocode.com) wrote:
Try to keep syscalls as minimal as possible.
Thanks! Applied!
---
src/core/namespace.c | 2 +-
src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 16
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Tue, 31.03.15 11:08, Andrew Jones (drjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
Thanks! Applied all three!
This series adds support for detecting if an arm or aarch64
deployment is a Xen or QEMU/KVM guest. I've tested the QEMU/KVM
detection on an AArch64 guest. The Xen detection has *not* been
tested, thus
Hi Shawn,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:59:29PM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Djalal Harouni tix...@opendz.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:10:34AM -0700, Shawn Landden wrote:
[...]
The point is that assert() and assert_se() should only be used for
46 matches
Mail list logo
