Hi,
On Fedora 22, systemd 219, NFS mounts no longer acquire a default label nfs_t.
mount 192.168.1.6:/var/exports/1 1 -orootcontext=system_u:object_r:nfs_t
mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified
[ 8316.276744] SELinux:
security_context_to_sid(system_u:object_r:nfs_t) failed for (dev 0
So, udev v220 crashes in my initramfs with the following message:
> starting version v220
> Assertion 'manager->pid == getpid()' failed at src/udev/udevd.c:568,
function ev
> Aborting.
It seems main calls manager_new() before forking, so the parent PID is
stored instead of child PID.
(I'm using
Dear group,
Since a while I am experimenting with systemd and kdbus, till now with
excellent results.
Recently I tried to bump all versions to LATEST/HEAD, and ran into some
issues.
My short question:
Is there a recommendation what kdbus version fits to the current systemd
V220?
Till now I
Hi Mantas,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> So, udev v220 crashes in my initramfs with the following message:
>
>> starting version v220
>> Assertion 'manager->pid == getpid()' failed at src/udev/udevd.c:568,
>> function ev
>> Aborting.
>
> It seems main calls manager
---
Makefile.am| 1 +
src/shared/generator.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index f84a28d..70d4dc0 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ AM_CPPFLAGS = \
-DCATALOG_DATABASE=\"$(catalogstate
This should also be flagged for backports since the hard-coded
/usr/lib/systemd path will break any initramfs if rootprefix != /usr.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-d
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
> Allowed interface name is relatively small. Lets not make
> users go in to the source code to figure out what happened.
>
> --machine=debian-tree conflicts with
> --machine=debian-tree2
>
> ex: Failed to add new veth \
> int
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> It was a warning when we still supported kernel < 3.4. current
> minimum version is 3.7.
Hm, we don't actually fail out here, but we still try to continue.
Isn't 'warning' more appropriate in that case?
Cheers,
Tom
> src/core/main.c
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> ---
> Makefile.am| 1 +
> src/shared/generator.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
> index f84a28d..70d4dc0 100644
> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -1
2015-05-20 1:01 GMT+08:00 Martin Pitt :
> Hey cee1,
>
> cee1 [2015-05-18 23:52 +0800]:
>> At the first glance, I find ureadahead has some difference compared
>> with the readahead once in systemd, IIRC:
>
> Yes, for sure. systemd's was improved quite a bit. ureadahead is
> mostly unmaintained, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
