Hi,
Thx for the answer.
>> Either way, +x has no meaning on sockets (only +w matters).
I guess this was the fact I was actually interested in.
Best regards
Marko Hoyer
Software Group II (ADITG/SW2)
Tel. +49 5121 49 6948
From: Mantas Mikulėnas [mailto:graw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Freitag, 24. Juni
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Menzel
wrote:
> Dear systemd folks,
>
>
> having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
> starting several services from it, is there a way, to let another
> service unit require all services started from that template?
>
I do not think it
Am 27.06.2016 um 08:30 schrieb Kai Hendry:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, at 01:03 PM, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
(I also have a strong dislike for network admins who cling to their "HTTP
only" firewall policies... I don't see why NTP is a 'lesser' protocol
than
HTTP and DNS, both of which require either t
2016-06-27 13:49 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Menzel
> wrote:
>> Dear systemd folks,
>>
>>
>> having a template for a service unit like `example@.service`, and
>> starting several services from it, is there a way, to let another
>> service unit require all s
Hi all,
Here's a quick set of updates and reminders regarding systemd.conf 2016
Important dates:
We've got a number of important dates that are approaching for
systemd.conf 2016.
* June 30th: Early-bird ticket sales ends. Save yourself or your
organization 20% by purchasing early-bird bird tick
Hi List,
My company is currently conducting research into the most viable container
technology that fits our stack (CentOS based) and given our already
widespread reliance on systemd, I have a personal stake in preferring not
to introduce other tooling (LXD, the 2nd place leader) into our stack.
On 06/27/2016 02:36 PM, Chris Kühl wrote:
Workshops:
A new addition to this year's conference is the workshop day. The goal
of this day is to offer hands-on training sessions to those who want
to learn more about systemd. It's intended that these trainings be
conducted by systemd community me
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, at 08:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> normally service level agreemnets contain basic prerequisites and if the
> are ignored the customers has to pay a penalty in case of support cases
You live in a different world to me.
Just going to follow up with a blog I found on the ma
Hi,
when using zfs in combination with systemd, users run into the following
problem:
- zfs manages mountpoints on its own and systemd is not aware of those.
- this leads to problems, when mountpoints for other filesystems are mounted
on directories in a zfs dataset or files are created in a d