Re: [systemd-devel] What information does machine-id leak?

2017-01-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.01.2017 um 20:54 schrieb Bryan Quigley: But what information is it carrying that is private? none - a UUID is by defintion UNIQUE but random stuff generated once and that's it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universally_unique_identifier ___

Re: [systemd-devel] How to disable Predictable Network Interface Names using a drop-in?

2017-01-20 Thread Brian Kroth
How about /etc/default/grub.d/ for the kernel parameter drop in file. That's how I do it at least. I don't think it's super well documented tho and I forget the suffix it expects offhand (*.cfg?). Follow the chain of the update-grub scripts and you should find it. Cheers, Brian On Fri, Jan 20,

Re: [systemd-devel] How to disable Predictable Network Interface Names using a drop-in?

2017-01-20 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
20.01.2017 17:51, Patrick Schleizer пишет: > Hi, > > I've learned about the kernel parameter and symlink ways to disable > predictable network interface names. However, as a Debian derivative, it > would be much cleaner using a drop-in to disable it. > > Is there some drop-in directory

Re: [systemd-devel] Having synchronization between 2 process using systemd.

2017-01-20 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Raghavendra. H. R wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a scenario in which I have 2 processes and both acts as Server & > Client. > Process A starts it server & tries to connect as client with Process B. > Process B starts it server & tries to

Re: [systemd-devel] WebUSB

2017-01-20 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:55:20PM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >  - so if we can make a rule that consistently detects USB devices with a > WebUSB > > interface defined, we should get this in as a standard

Re: [systemd-devel] WebUSB

2017-01-20 Thread Lars Knudsen
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Simon McVittie < simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 at 10:20:33 +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote: > > 2. make sure that webusb devices will be somehow accessible to be used > by a > > browser running with user permissions (current temp solution

Re: [systemd-devel] WebUSB

2017-01-20 Thread Lars Knudsen
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:43:24AM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Simon McVittie < > simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 at 10:20:33

Re: [systemd-devel] WebUSB

2017-01-20 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:43:24AM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Simon McVittie > > wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 at 10:20:33 +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote: > > 2. make sure that webusb devices will be somehow

Re: [systemd-devel] WebUSB

2017-01-20 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 01:18:12PM +0100, Lars Knudsen wrote: > > The full device should be fine if it has a WebUSB interface (even in a > > composite scenario) > > Really?  You want to allow someone "raw" access to a composite device > just because of one specific interface? > >

[systemd-devel] What information does machine-id leak?

2017-01-20 Thread Bryan Quigley
Hi there, I see that there is a concern that we need to keep machine-id private (and local?). I haven't been able to determine exactly why though*. In most cases it's randomly generated afaict. I'd consider using it to replace whoopsie-id which is generated from the machines BIOS information

Re: [systemd-devel] What information does machine-id leak?

2017-01-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:02:07PM -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: > Hi there, > > I see that there is a concern that we need to keep machine-id private > (and local?). I haven't been able to determine exactly why though*. > In most cases it's randomly generated afaict. It's a unique identifier for

Re: [systemd-devel] Having synchronization between 2 process using systemd.

2017-01-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.01.2017 um 11:20 schrieb Raghavendra. H. R: I have a scenario in which I have 2 processes and both acts as Server & Client. Process A starts it server & tries to connect as client with Process B. Process B starts it server & tries to connect as client with Process A. We want handle this